World News Headlines

Coverage of breaking stories

Choose the sentence that has a subject complement.?

source : yahoo.com

Choose the sentence that has a subject complement.?

Subject Complements

In addition to the transitive verb and the intransitive verb, there is a third kind of verb called a linking verb. The word (or phrase) which follows a linking verb is called not an object, but a subject complement.

The most common linking verb is “be.” Other linking verbs are “become,” “seem,” “appear,” “feel,” “grow,” “look,” “smell,” “taste,” and “sound,” among others. Note that some of these are sometimes linking verbs, sometimes transitive verbs, or sometimes intransitive verbs, depending on how you use them:

Linking verb with subject complement

He was a radiologist before he became a full-time yoga instructor.

Linking verb with subject complement

Your homemade chili smells delicious.

Transitive verb with direct object

I can’t smell anything with this terrible cold.

Intransitive verb with no object

The interior of the beautiful new Buick smells strongly of fish.

Note that a subject complement can be either a noun (“radiologist”, “instructor”) or an adjective (“delicious”).

It’s def. not A or D.

I’m not sure, but it’s def. between B and C and I lean more towards B. Good luck!

Subject Complement

Subject Complement – You would have come across the word complement a thousand times while reading, listening or writing English language. A subject complement is a word, phrase or clause in a sentence that is either itself a noun or an adjective or it acts as a noun or an adjective.Every English sentence except the one-member and the imperative must have a subject. The subject is one of the two main parts of the sentence. The subject can be expressed by these parts of speech and groups of words which are connected with the idea of subjectivityA subject complement is the adjective, noun, or pronoun that follows a linking verb. The following verbs are true linking verbs: any form of the verb be [am, is, are, was, were, has been, are being, might have been In the question, the sentence 'I felt much better' can be re-written as 'I am much better'.

Structural Types of the Subject | Imperative sentences – 1. For each of the following, choose the sentence in which the subject and verb agree. A). Every one of the shirts has a green collar. Every one of the shirts have a green collar. 2. A). This singer, along with a few others, play the harmonica on stage.S-subject, DO-direct object, SC-subject complement, OP-object of preposition Our study efforts should go to (whatever subject is most in need of. Which sentence contains a predicate pronoun as a subject complement? 1) The best person for the job is she. 2) The ground is sloping and uneven.*Linking verb with subject complement. Your homemade chili smells delicious. Transitive verb with direct object. This Site Might Help You. RE: Choose the sentence that has a subject complement.? A. The nurse felt my pulse. B. I felt much better.

Structural Types of the Subject | Imperative sentences

Choose the sentence that has a subject complement. – Brainly.com – The sentence (and the independent and dependent clause as well) must have an explicit or implicit subject and verb. The typical sentence that you will write for college or career writing situations will have explicitly stated subjects and verbs and will most often also have complements and modifiers.If a sentence has both direct and indirect objects, then what appears first in the sentence? Identify the indirect object in the following sentence. If there is none, choose none.The nail tech painted my nails with red polish by Opi, my favorite brand.Choose the sentence that has a subject complement the nurse felt your pulse I felt much better the day ended with many surprises We cant leave without seeing her? There is no subject complement in this sentence.

Class 6 English Grammar Chapter 2: Parts of the Sentence ...
Is shopping for clothes your favourite pastime? - Wear it ...
Quality | HENRY KOTULA
Subject Complement Worksheet With Answers ...
PPT - Grammar: Parts of Speech PowerPoint Presentation ...
TYPE OF SENTENCES
DIAGRAMMING SENTENCES - Unmasa Dalha
Mockinbirdhillcottage: Sentence Without A Complement
Week 2: Identifying Function and Verbs | Pearltrees
PPT - Grammar: Parts of Speech PowerPoint Presentation ...
Direct or indirect interrogative clauses-English

Identifying Phrases – .

Subject Verb Complement Word Order English Grammar – .

How Can We Tell What Roles Nouns Play? Case Theory – So let’s talk about outfits.
No matter where you are or what you do, if
you want to fit in, you’ll probably dress the part. An FBI agent working tirelessly to expose
Soviet spies might put on a suit and flash their badge, while an undercover Russian operative
trying to blend in will probably ditch their furry ushanka hat and slip into something
a bit more American. And just like people, words’ll often wrap
themselves up in whatever garb matches the grammatical role they’re supposed to play. So, where do they get these getups, and what
do they do when they can’t find anything that fits? I’m Moti Lieberman, and this is The Ling
Space. Verbs are kind of like the engines that drive
sentences, and they usually come with a set of pretty specific instructions. The act of poisoning, for instance, comes
with two clearly defined roles that have to be filled: a poisoner, and someone who gets poisoned,
as in “Elizabeth poisoned the college student." Something like “give” has three: a giver,
a recipient, and whatever’s being exchanged, like in “William gave the container to Philip.” These words can’t function unless they’re supplied
with the necessary pieces to complete the picture. Zooming out a little, we can find patterns
across different verbs. Both “poison” and “give,” along with
countless other verbs, need agents — phrases that represent the doer of the action. And verbs often also need themes, which are
the people and things that a verb affects. Of course, verbs can have other requirements,
too, like experiencers of emotional states, locations for the actions to take place, and
goals to move towards. In an earlier episode, we called these more
generic roles “theta roles”, and to guarantee that they get filled, we introduced the Theta Criterion,
which is a kind of rule that makes sure that the scaffolding holding up our sentences sets aside
just the right amount of space that each verb needs. Now, in a language like English, picking out
which roles match which phrases is usually as easy as keeping track of a sentence’s
grammatical relations, like its subject and object. And since word order’s pretty strict, it
really just comes down to what shows up before the verb, and what shows up after. As long as we’re able to follow what goes
where, we can sort of recreate who’s doing what to whom; the subject’s usually going
to be the agent, while the object will typically be some kind of theme. But what about languages whose word order
isn’t as rigid? To tell apart subjects, objects, and other
grammatical bits and pieces, languages with more flexible word orders make use of case. Case is a way of directly marking the grammatical
role played by the parts of a sentence. The varieties of English spoken a millennium
ago had a freer word order, and used five different cases to keep on top of things. But over time, it lost these distinctions,
and now only has a few. In modern English, case only shows up on pronouns:
it’s what gives us the difference between they, their, and them. On the other hand, modern German still has
some flexibility baked into it, and keeps track of everything by altering the forms
of its noun phrases. Both “Der Mann sieht den Hund” and “Den
Hund sieht der Mann” can express the same thought — that the man sees the dog. The reordering doesn’t mess with
the basic idea, since German's nominative and accusative determiners point out the subject
and object, respectively. Of course, we can’t forget Latin, which
on top of gender and number and five independent noun classes, infamously also employed six
cases. Latin used various suffixes to express many
of the categories we’ve seen already, while adding others like the vocative, which is
used when addressing people. And case systems extend well beyond Indo-European
languages, too. Hungarian puts Latin to shame with its 18
cases, and Japanese has at least 9. So, it looks as if case is a handy way to
follow the plot of a sentence without getting lost about which parts are doing what. It’s like a costume or a uniform that words
wear to tell the world “Hey, I’m a subject” or “Look, I’m an object.” But, is that really all there is to the story? Or can we throw on our spy glasses and look
a little bit closer? As it turns out, we can actually gain a deeper
understanding of what case is by asking another question we haven’t fully explored yet:
why words move. Going all the way back to the beginning of
this series, we’ve been saying that words aren’t always happy with where you put them;
sometimes they get a bit antsy, and need to go out for a walk. It’s easiest to see this in questions, like
in “What did Paige say to Pastor Tim?” In theory, that “what” should follow the
verb “say,” since it’s what Paige said, and because English usually puts that kind
of information after the verb, not before. But because it’s a question, that wh-word
has moved over to the front. In this case, it’s fairly straightforward
to say that things were moved around to make it more obvious we’re asking something,
instead of telling. But we’ve seen other kinds of movement that
don’t have as obvious an explanation. For instance, in our episode on raising verbs,
we looked at sentences like “Paige seems to be worried about keeping their secret.” We argued that the subject — Paige — is
actually more closely connected to “worry” than “seem,” since people are generally
worriers, and not seemers. And so we concluded that “Paige” must be
climbing out of the lower clause to become the subject of the higher one. Since English sentences always need a subject,
something has to fill that position. But that higher subject position can be filled in other
ways, like with the non-referential pronoun "it." So like, “It seems that Paige is worried
about keeping their secret.” And in this case, Paige stays put. Notice that each option connects up to a slightly
different structure: if Paige moves, the lower clause is tenseless, which you can tell because
it’s still "to be." But if Paige stays put, it’s tensed, with
"is." We can’t say either “Paige seems that
is worried about keeping their secret” or “It seems Paige to be worried about keeping
their secret.” So what’s going on, here? Insight in how to solve this puzzle came in
the early 1980s, when linguist Noam Chomsky proposed that this kind of movement actually
revolved around the phenomenon of case. In particular, he suggested that case isn’t
only something that noun phrases may have, it’s something that they must have — even if
it isn’t always so obvious, like in English. To be able to show up in any given sentence,
a noun phrase has to go find a spot where it can receive case. And those spots are in limited supply; for subjects,
it means being right up next to a tensed verb. Let’s see how this actually works. So, the idea is that we start off with a structure
that has some verb in it — say, “pass”. That verb needs an agent subject and a theme
object to make up a complete sentence; in comes the Theta Criterion, to make sure that those
parts are filled. But this clause happens to be tenseless, which
means that the subject can’t stay put to get the nominative case that it needs. Luckily, there’s a tensed verb in the next
clause up, so the subject pronoun climbs to the top of the tree where it can finally take
the nominative form “she”. In tensed clauses, no movement is needed. We can be sure that nominative case must be
assigned to noun phrases only in the presence of tensed verbs, because we never see it happen
next to tenseless ones. In fact, in those cases where we do see subjects
in tenseless clauses, because they have nowhere higher to climb, they’ve always taken on an accusative
form, as in “They expect her to co-operate." It’s as if, to rescue the subject of the
lower clause from being filtered out on account of its case-less-ness, the higher verb treats
it as an object. Verbs like “expect” engage in this exceptional
case-marking because every noun phrase needs case to make it into the sentence. Even full noun phrases like “meeting”
or “investigation,” which don’t show any obvious sign of having case in English,
need to either be direct objects or the subjects of tensed clauses. Extending the idea a bit further, we can even begin to
see why different languages have different word orders. If it’s true that all languages underlyingly
have the same sentential architecture, the reason that noun phrases can show up in such
drastically different places follows from each system assigning case in a different
position. In English, an SVO language, nominative case
is assigned to the left of the verb, but in VSO languages like Irish, it’s assigned
to the right. So what ends up where really depends on where
each language decides to hand out case. We’ve even seen what happens when noun phrases
don’t make it through this Case Filter. In the sentence “Gabriel claims to know
what’s best for the Jennings family,” the subject “Gabriel” hasn’t risen up
out of the lower clause, since he really is the one doing the claiming. But because he’s also doing the knowing,
we’ve argued there must be a silent pronoun that refers back to Gabriel, sitting at the
front of the embedded clause. So, the sentence comes out to mean something
like “Gabriel claims he knows what’s best for the Jennings family.” With this new idea at our disposal, we can
finally make sense of why this should be. Because the lower clause has no tense, and
the verb “claim” isn’t the sort that can assign case to something following it,
our silent pronoun is left out in the cold. As speakers, we understand it’s there. But it remains unpronounced, because it has
no way of getting any case. If the Theta Criterion is like a casting director, this need
for case — overt or otherwise — is kind of like an editor. A noun phrase might make it into a sentence,
but if it can’t manage to find the right wardrobe, it just won’t make it into the
picture. So, we’ve reached the end of The Ling Space
for this week. If you moved to the right place, you learned
that case can be a good way of keeping track of which words are doing what in a sentence;
that noun phrases actually need case, whether overt or covert, to actually make the final
cut into our sentences; and that in order to get case, words sometimes need to move
around, which explains certain kinds of movement, and different word orders. The Ling Space is made by all these amazing
people over here. If you want to learn more about how case works
in passive sentences, check back on our website! And while you’re there, why not check out
our store? We’re also on Tumblr, Twitter, and Facebook,
and if you want to keep expanding your own personal Ling Space, please subscribe. See you next time! Pinne kaaNaam! .