source : symbolab.com

## Functions & Graphing Calculator – Symbolab

## Analyze and graph line equations and functions step-by-step

full pad »

\bold{\mathrm{Basic}}

\bold{\alpha\beta\gamma}

\bold{\mathrm{AB\Gamma}}

\bold{\sin\cos}

\bold{\ge\div\rightarrow}

\bold{\overline{x}\space\mathbb{C}\forall}

\bold{\sum\space\int\space\product}

\bold{\begin{pmatrix}\square&\square\\square&\square\end{pmatrix}}

\bold{H_{2}O}

\square^{2}

x^{\square}

\sqrt{\square}

\nthroot[\msquare]{\square}

\frac{\msquare}{\msquare}

\log_{\msquare}

\pi

\theta

\infty

\int

\frac{d}{dx}

\ge

\le

\cdot

\div

x^{\circ}

(\square)

|\square|

(f\:\circ\:g)

f(x)

\ln

e^{\square}

\left(\square\right)^{‘}

\frac{\partial}{\partial x}

\int_{\msquare}^{\msquare}

\lim

\sum

\sin

\cos

\tan

\cot

\csc

\sec

\alpha

\beta

\gamma

\delta

\zeta

\eta

\theta

\iota

\kappa

\lambda

\mu

\nu

\xi

\pi

\rho

\sigma

\tau

\upsilon

\phi

\chi

\psi

\omega

A

B

\Gamma

\Delta

E

Z

H

\Theta

K

\Lambda

M

N

\Xi

\Pi

P

\Sigma

T

\Upsilon

\Phi

X

\Psi

\Omega

\sin

\cos

\tan

\cot

\sec

\csc

\sinh

\cosh

\tanh

\coth

\sech

\arcsin

\arccos

\arctan

\arccot

\arcsec

\arccsc

\arcsinh

\arccosh

\arctanh

\arccoth

\arcsech

+

–

=

\div

/

\cdot

\times

<

” >>

\le

\ge

(\square)

[\square]

▭\:\longdivision{▭}

\times \twostack{▭}{▭}

+ \twostack{▭}{▭}

– \twostack{▭}{▭}

\square!

x^{\circ}

\rightarrow

\lfloor\square\rfloor

\lceil\square\rceil

\overline{\square}

\vec{\square}

\in

\forall

\notin

\exist

\mathbb{R}

\mathbb{C}

\mathbb{N}

\mathbb{Z}

\emptyset

\vee

\wedge

\neg

\oplus

\cap

\cup

\square^{c}

\subset

\subsete

\superset

\supersete

\int

\int\int

\int\int\int

\int_{\square}^{\square}

\int_{\square}^{\square}\int_{\square}^{\square}

\int_{\square}^{\square}\int_{\square}^{\square}\int_{\square}^{\square}

\sum

\prod

\lim

\lim _{x\to \infty }

\lim _{x\to 0+}

\lim _{x\to 0-}

\frac{d}{dx}

\frac{d^2}{dx^2}

\left(\square\right)^{‘}

\left(\square\right)^{”}

\frac{\partial}{\partial x}

(2\times2)

(2\times3)

(3\times3)

(3\times2)

(4\times2)

(4\times3)

(4\times4)

(3\times4)

(2\times4)

(5\times5)

(1\times2)

(1\times3)

(1\times4)

(1\times5)

(1\times6)

(2\times1)

(3\times1)

(4\times1)

(5\times1)

(6\times1)

(7\times1)

\mathrm{Radians}

\mathrm{Degrees}

\square!

(

)

%

\mathrm{clear}

\arcsin

\sin

\sqrt{\square}

7

8

9

\div

\arccos

\cos

\ln

4

5

6

\times

\arctan

\tan

\log

1

2

3

–

\pi

e

x^{\square}

0

.

\bold{=}

+

## Most Used Actions

\mathrm{simplify}

\mathrm{solve\:for}

\mathrm{inverse}

\mathrm{tangent}

\mathrm{line}

Related »

Graph »

Number Line »

Examples »

Correct Answer 🙂

Let’s Try Again 🙁

Try to further simplify

Verify

## Related

## Number Line

## Graph

Sorry, your browser does not support this application

## Examples

functions-graphing-calculator

en

Steps for Sketching the Graph of the Function on eMathHelp – If function is obtained by transforming simpler function, perform corresponding shift, compressing/stretching. It is often convenient to draw all points Example 3. Sketch graph of the function `f(x)=(x^2-5x+6)/(x^2+1)`. There is no simpler function that initial function is obtained from.The graph of a quadratic function is a parabola. The parabola can either be in "legs up" or "legs down" orientation. We know that a quadratic equation will be in the form If you are trying to find the zeros for the function (that is find x when f(x) = 0), then that is simply done using quadratic equation – no…Since in our problem the function g(x) = f(x – c) + k, we have shifted the function f(x) c units to the right and k units upward, that is, we have shifted the function f(x) 5 You know the right answer? The graph of f(x) = x2 is translated to form g(x) = (x – 5)2 + 1.which graph represents g(x)?…

How to find the equation of a quadratic function from its graph – Start studying Quadratic Functions Unit Test. Learn vocabulary, terms and more with flashcards, games and other study tools. What value represents the vertical translation from the graph of the parent function f(x) = x2 to the graph of the function g(x) = (x + 5)2 + 3?Graph a Linear Function f(x) = 3x – 2. 131 326 просмотров 131 тыс. просмотров. • 22 мая 2012 г. How to graph a linear function using the slope and y-intercept.calculista calculista. we have. This is a quadratic equation (vertical parabola) open up. The vertex is a minimum-> vertex is the point. The domain of the function is all real numbers-> interval (-∞,∞).

The graph of f(x) = x2 is translated to form g(x) = (x – 5) 2 + 1.which… – 8. Find The Critical Points For The Function F(x) – 12x-x. Transcribed Image Text from this Question. 7. Which graph represents the function f(x) = x(x – 1)(x-3)?An easy way to think about discontinuity is that a discontinuity exists whenever you cannot draw that part of the graph without lifting up your pencil. If we look at the parts of the function, f(x), it is the sum of continuous functions, all of which are defined for all real numbers.Step-by-step explanation: Given : Function. To find : Which graph represents ? Solution The vertex of the upward parabola is (-2,-3). The x-intercept are (-3.732,0) and (-0.268,0).

**Vector function for the curve of intersection of two surfaces (KristaKingMath)** – .

**Solving Rational Inequalities** – .

**Closest Point to the Origin | MIT 18.01SC Single Variable Calculus, Fall 2010** – CHRISTINE BREINER: Welcome

back to recitation.

Today we're going to work

on an optimization problem. So the question I

want us to answer is, what point on the curve y

equals square root of x plus 4 comes closest to the origin? I've drawn a sketch

of this curve. The scale in this

direction– each hash mark is one unit in the x

direction, each hash mark here is one unit in the y direction. Just want to point

out two easy places to figure out the

distance to the origin. Over here, where the curve

starts at negative 4, 0, the distance to the

origin is 4 units. And here at (0, 2) the distance

to the origin is two units. It's probably, we could

safely say, further away here. So we're anticipating

that somewhere along the curve

in this region is where we should find our place

that's closest to the origin. The only reason I

point that out is that, when you're doing these problems

on your own you should always try and anticipate roughly

where things should happen, in what kind of region, so that

you don't– you don't start thinking, if you do something

wrong and you get x equals 100 and then you come back

and look at the curve, you realize right away, well,

that doesn't make any sense. So we want to always be thinking

as we're solving the problems, does my answer make sense? So I'm actually going to

give you a little bit of time to work on this yourself

and then I'll come back and I'll work on it as well. Welcome back. Hopefully you were able to get

pretty far into this problem. And so I will start

working on it now. So again, the

question is that we want to optimize– in this

case, minimize– the distance to the origin from this curve. And so what we're really trying

to do is we have a constraint, the constraint is we

have to be on the curve, and then we also have something

we're trying to minimize. And the thing we're trying

to minimize is distance. And so we have to make sure that

we understand the two equations that we need– the optimization,

or the constraint equation, and the optimizing equation. So to optimize we need to

know how to measure distance in two-dimensional space. And one point I want

to make is that if you want to optimize distance

you might as well optimize the square of distance

because it's much easier. So let me justify that

briefly and then we'll go on. So I want to optimize the

distance squared to the origin. It's, well distance, you

remember, first in general, between two points

(x, y) and (a, b) is something in this form. Distance squared

is the difference between the x-value

squared plus the difference between the y-value squared. This is, should remind you

of the Pythagorean theorem, ultimately. So in this case, in our

case, distance to the origin is x squared plus y squared. The distance squared is

x squared plus y squared. I just told you that instead

of trying to optimize distance, we can optimize

distance squared. Why is that? Well, remember that

when you optimize, what you're looking

for is a place where the derivative of the function

of interest is equal to 0. So what I want to

point out is that when you take the

derivative of distance squared and find

where that's 0, it's going to be the

same as the place where the derivative of

distance is equal to 0. So let's notice that. So this is a little

sidebar justification. Notice d squared prime

is equal to 2d d prime. Where did that come from? That's this is implicit

differentiation with respect to x and

this is the chain rule. So if I want d

prime to equal 0, I can also find where d

squared prime equals 0. I'm assuming– notice

the distance is never at the origin– so

distance is never 0. So I don't have to

worry about that. So that's a small

sidebar, but just to justify why we can do that. Now let's come back into

the problem at hand. What is our optimization

problem, equation that we want to minimize? We want to minimize this

equation with respect to a certain constraint. What's the constraint? The constraint is what y is. y depends on x. And so when I solve

these problems I'm going to have to

substitute in my constraint. So y squared is the square root

of x plus 4 quantity squared, so I just get x plus 4. So now I have my

optimization equation. How do I find a

minimum or a maximum? I take the derivative

and set it equal to 0. So let me come give

myself a little more room and do that over here. So d squared prime, now I get

derivative of x squared is 2x. The derivative of x is 1,

and the derivative of 4 is 0. This will be optimized

when this is equal to 0. So 0 equals 2x plus 1. So x is equal to minus 1/2. Does this pass, as we would

say maybe, the smell test? Does it smell OK to us? The answer will be yes. Because remember, we said

somewhere in this x region is where we expect that we

will have a distance closest, point closest to the origin. And so we're right

here on the x value. Now we have to find what the y

value is to finish the problem. But this is not, so

far, very surprising. It seems like maybe

the right thing. Now we have x. So now how do we find y? Well, we know what y is. y is equal to the

square root of x plus 4, so it's equal to the square

root of negative 1/2 plus 4, which simplified is 3 and

1/2, which I think is 7/2. So the point is negative 1/2

comma square root of 7/2. And then you just want to

double check and make sure, did I ask for the distance

or did I ask for the point? And right now we have the

point, so let's come over and make sure what

point on the curve comes closest to the origin. So now we know that we've

answered the correct question. So again, it was a

maximize– sorry, it was a minimizing problem. It was an optimization

problem where we wanted to minimize distance. We had a constraint equation. We had the thing we

wanted to minimize. And then we took the

derivative of the minimizer, set it– of the optimizing

equation, set it equal to 0, solved for x, and then found the

answer to the specific question by then finding the y-value. And I think I'll stop there. .