World News Headlines

Coverage of breaking stories

What event led the Truman administration to expand the containment doctrine to include Asia? withdrawal of t?

source : yahoo.com

What event led the Truman administration to expand the containment doctrine to include Asia? withdrawal of t?

None of your answers are correct although the “Surrender of Japan at the end of WW-2” is the closest.

a) When Japan surrendered, the British moved into the southern half of (current) Vietnam (Cochin China) while the Nationalist Chinese moved into the northern region (Tonkin and Annam). The French came back in and the British and nationalist Chinese left.

The First Indochina War (War of Independence 1946-1954) broke out and the US gave aid to France under the “Marshall Plan” which included arms amd military supplies including planes. The US also supplied pilots to fly supply missions for the French from 1948 onwards and combat missions from 1949 onwards.

—————

What event led to Harry Truman expanding the “Containment Doctrine” to Asia?

The “containment policy was early as 1946, so….

The expansion of the communist movement in China. The US had been backing the right-wing military dictator, Chiang Kai Shek and his Kuomintang government since the 1920’s, and continued to do so.

— The Communist government take-over of China was in 1949

— The withdrawal of the French started in 1954 and finished in 1956 — under President Eisenhower.

— The creation of the “National Liberating Front of Southern Vietnam” was in December 1959, also under President Eisenhower. The term “Viet Cong” is inaccurate and inflammatory. It is shortened slang for Viet Nam Cong San, meaning Vietnamese Communist, something that less than 4% of the NLF fighters were.

Source(s): A former TV news cameraman and journalist with over 30 uyears in the industry in Australia and Southeast Asia.
Currently a SE Asian historian.

The Truman Doctrine for APUSH | Simple, Easy, Direct

The Truman Doctrine for APUSH | Simple, Easy, Direct – Truman Doctrine for APUSH About the Author: Johnny Roy, PhD has been an Advanced Placement US History teacher for the past 9 years at Cuyahoga Initially envisioned as a financial aid program to Greece and Turkey in 1947, the doctrine was expanded to include economic and military assistance…Now, Trump is likely preparing to invoke the Insurrection Act or some other form of military authority to conduct mass arrests of the traitors who have betrayed this nation (which now includes VP Mike Pence, Lindsay Graham, Mitch McConnell and many others).1955: -The Truman Doctrine – The Potsdam Conference Both the Truman Doctrine and Potsdam Conference were rhetorical confrontations between The Containment Policy was a reaction to a series of moves by the Soviet Union to expand communist influence in Eastern European, China…

Trump did NOT concede… Lin Wood explains "many traitors" to be… – Truman Doctrine : Truman's promise that the U.S. would provide political, military, and economic support to democratic nations facing threats from authoritarian forces. Truman hoped to extend New Deal social programs to include more government protection and services and reach more people.The foreign policy of the Harry S. Truman administration was the foreign policy of the United States from April 12, 1945 to January 20, 1953, when Harry S. Truman served as the President of the United States.What events lead to the US Cold War policy?. What we know. Issues after WW2: decision making between Big 3 bad (distrust) What we will learn Specific events that led to those Cold War policies of Containment How closely the US and USSR were to combat How relative the Truman Doctrine was…

Trump did NOT concede… Lin Wood explains "many traitors" to be...

History gcse – Truman Doctrine and Potsdam conference – The containment doctrine, with its ambiguities and imprecision, was a major strategy and the guiding conception in American foreign policy from shortly after World War How, Americans asked sincerely, could the Truman administration's offer, which they incorrectly deemed magnanimous, be rejected?Containment and The Truman Doctrine By: Alyvia Browning Containment This is a U.S He was convinced that if the Soviet Union failed to expand, its social system would eventually break down. The Truman Doctrine was a policy to get rid of communism by giving military and economic aid to…[Show full abstract] Asia has differed from its preceding noir works in the scholarship of noir genre. As a preliminary finding, this study only highlights the shifting noir elements taken from selected noir stories represented by some noir anthologies produced in Southeast Asia.

Nonfiction 5 - GrossWords Book Archive

APUSH Period 8 Review (1945-1980): Domestic – .

The Cold War: Crash Course US History #37 – Hi I’m John Green; this is Crash Course
U.S.
history and today we’re gonna talk about the Cold War.
The Cold War is called “Cold” because it supposedly never heated up into actual
armed conflict, which means, you know, that it wasn’t a war.
Mr. Green, Mr. Green, but if the War on Christmas is a war and the War on Drugs is a war…
You’re not going to hear me say this often in your life, Me from the Past, but that was
a good point. At least the Cold War was not an attempt to make war on a noun, which almost
never works, because nouns are so resilient. And to be fair, the Cold War did involve quite
a lot of actual war, from Korea to Afghanistan, as the world’s two superpowers, the United
States and the U.S.S.R., sought ideological and strategic influence throughout the world.
So perhaps it’s best to think of the Cold War as an era, lasting roughly from 1945 to
1990. Discussions of the Cold War tend to center
on international and political history and those are very important, which is why we’ve
talked about them in the past. This, however, is United States history, so let us heroically
gaze–as Americans so often do–at our own navel.
(Libertage.) Stan, why did you turn the globe to the Green
Parts of Not-America? I mean, I guess to be fair, we were a little bit obsessed with this
guy. So, the Cold War gave us great spy novels,
independence movements, an arms race, cool movies like Dr. Strangelove and War Games,
one of the most evil mustaches in history. But it also gave us a growing awareness that
the greatest existential threat to human beings is ourselves. It changed the way we imagine
the world and humanity’s role in it. In his Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech, William
Faulkner famously said, “Our tragedy today is a general and universal physical fear so
long sustained by now that we can even bear it. There are no longer problems of the spirit.
There is only the question: When will I be blown up?”
So, today we’re gonna look at how that came to be the dominant question of human existence,
and whether we can ever get past it. intro
So after WWII the U.S. and the USSR were the only two nations with any power left. The
United States was a lot stronger – we had atomic weapons, for starters, and also the
Soviets had lost 20 million people in the war and they were led by a sociopathic mustachioed
Joseph Stalin. But the U.S. still had worries: we needed
a strong, free-market-oriented Europe (and to a lesser extent Asia) so that all the goods
we were making could find happy homes. The Soviets, meanwhile, were concerned with
something more immediate, a powerful Germany invading them. Again. Germany–and please
do not take this personally, Germans–was very, very slow to learn the central lesson
of world history: Do not invade Russia. Unless you’re the Mongols.
(Mongoltage.) So at the end of World War II, the USSR “encouraged”
the creation of pro-communist governments in Bulgaria, Romania, and Poland–which was
a relatively easy thing to encourage, because those nations were occupied by Soviet troops.
The idea for the Soviets was to create a communist buffer between them and Germany, but to the
U.S. it looked like communism might just keep expanding, and that would be really bad for
us, because who would buy all of our sweet, sweet industrial goods?
So America responded with the policy of containment, as introduced in diplomat George F. Kennan’s
famous Long Telegram. Communism could stay where it was, but it would not be allowed
to spread. And ultimately this is why we fought very
real wars in both Korea and Vietnam. As a government report from 1950 put it the
goals of containment were: 1. Block further expansion of Soviet power
2. Expose the falsities of soviet pretensions 3. Induce a retraction of the Kremlin’s
control and influence, and 4. In general, foster the seeds of destruction
within the Soviet system. Harry Truman, who as you’ll recall, became
President in 1945 after Franklin Delano Prez 4 Life Roosevelt died, was a big fan of containment,
and the first real test of it came in Greece and Turkey in 1947.
This was a very strategically valuable region because it was near the Middle East, and I
don’t know if you’ve noticed this, but the United States has been just, like, a smidge
interested in the Middle East the last several decades because of oil glorious oil.
Right, so Truman announced the so-called Truman Doctrine, because you know why not name a
doctrine after yourself, in which he pledged to support “freedom-loving peoples” against
communist threats, which is all fine and good. But who will protect us against “peoples,”
the pluralization of an already plural noun? Anyway, we eventually sent 0 million in
aid to Greece and Turkey, and we were off to the Cold War races.
The Truman Doctrine created the language through which Americans would view the world with
America as free and communists as tyrannical. According to our old friend Eric Foner, “The
speech set a precedent for American assistance to anticommunist regimes throughout the world,
no matter how undemocratic, and for the creation of a set of global military alliances directed
against the Soviet Union.”[1] It also led to the creation of a new security
apparatus – the National Security Council, the Central Intelligence Agency, the Atomic
Energy Commission, all of which were somewhat immune from government oversight and definitely
not democratically elected. And the containment policy and the Truman
Doctrine also laid the foundations for a military build-up – an arms race – which would
become a key feature of the Cold War. But it wasn’t all about the military, at
least at first. Like, the Marshall Plan was first introduced at Harvard’s Commencement
address in June 1947 by, get this, George Marshall, in what turned out to be, like,
the second most important commencement address in all of American history. Yes, yes, Stan,
okay. It was a great speech, thank you for noticing. Alright, let’s go to the Thought
Bubble. The Marshall Plan was a response to economic
chaos in Europe brought on by a particularly harsh winter that strengthened support for
communism in France and Italy. The plan sought to use US Aid to combat the
economic instability that provided fertile fields for communism. As Marshall said “ our
policy is not directed against any country or doctrine, but against hunger, poverty,
desperation and chaos.” [2] Basically it was a New Deal for Europe, and it worked;
Western Europe was rebuilt so that by 1950 production levels in industry had eclipsed
pre-war levels and Europe was on its way to becoming a U.S. style-capitalist-mass-consumer
society. Which it still is, kind of. Japan, although not technically part of the
Marshall Plan, was also rebuilt. General Douglas MacArthur was basically the dictator there,
forcing Japan to adopt a new constitution, giving women the vote, and pledging that Japan
would foreswear war, in exchange for which the United States effectively became Japan’s
defense force. This allowed Japan to spend its money on other things, like industry,
which worked out really well for them. Meanwhile Germany was experiencing the first
Berlin crisis. At the end of the war, Germany was divided into East and West, and even though
the capital, Berlin, was entirely in the east, it was also divided into east and west. This
meant that West Berlin was dependent on shipments of goods from West Germany through East Germany.
And then, in 1948, Stalin cut off the roads to West Berlin. So, the Americans responded
with an 11-month-long airlift of supplies that eventually led to Stalin lifting the
blockade in 1948 and building the Berlin Wall, which stood until 1991, when Kool Aid Guy–no,
wait, wait, wait, wait, that wasn’t when the Berlin Wall was built. That was in 1961.
I just wanted to give Thought Bubble the opportunity to make that joke.
Thanks, Thought Bubble. So right, the Wall wasn’t built until 1961, but 1949 did see
Germany officially split into two nations, and also the Soviets detonated their first
atomic bomb, and NATO was established, AND the Chinese Revolution ended in communist
victory. So, by the end of 1950, the contours of the
Cold War had been established, West versus East, Capitalist Freedom versus Communist
totalitarianism. At least from where I’m sitting. Although
now apparently I’m going to change where I’m sitting because it’s time for the
Mystery Document. The rules here are simple. I guess the author of the Mystery Document
and about 55% of the time I get shocked by the shock pen.
“We must organize and enlist the energies and resources of the free world in a positive
program for peace which will frustrate the Kremlin design for world domination by creating
a situation in the free world to which the Kremlin will be compelled to adjust. Without
such a cooperative effort, led by the United States, we will have to make gradual withdrawals
under pressure until we discover one day that we have sacrificed positions of vital interest.
It is imperative that this trend be reversed by a much more rapid and concerted build-up
of the actual strength of both the United States and the other nations of the free world.”
I mean all I can say about it is that it sounds American and, like, it was written in, like,
1951 and it seems kind of like a policy paper or something really boring so I…I mean…
Yeah, I’m just going to have to take the shock. AH!
National Security Council report NSC-68? Are you kidding me, Stan? Not-not 64? Or 81? 68?
This is ridiculous! I call injustice. Anyway, as the apparently wildly famous NSC-68
shows, the U.S. government cast the Cold War as a rather epic struggle between freedom
and tyranny, and that led to remarkable political consensus–both democrats and republicans
supported most aspects of cold war policy, especially the military build-up part.
Now, of course, there were some critics, like Walter Lippmann who worried that casting foreign
policy in such stark ideological terms would result in the U.S. getting on the wrong side
of many conflicts, especially as former colonies sought to remove the bonds of empire and become
independent nations. But yeah, no, nothing like that ever happened.
Yeah, I mean, it’s not like that happened in Iran or Nicaragua or Argentina or Brazil
or Guatemala or Stan are you really going to make me list all of them? Fine. Or Haiti
or Paraguay or the Philippines or Chile or Iraq or Indonesia or Zaire or, I’m sorry,
THERE WERE A LOT OF THEM, OKAY? But these interventions were viewed as necessary
to prevent the spread of communism, which was genuinely terrifying to people and it’s
important to understand that. Like, national security agencies pushed Hollywood
to produce anticommunist movies like “The Red Menace,” which scared people. And the
CIA funded magazines, news broadcasts, concerts, art exhibitions, that gave examples of American
freedom. It even supported painters like Jackson Pollack and the Museum of Modern Art in New
York because American expressionism was the vanguard of artistic freedom and the exact
opposite of Soviet socialist realism. I mean, have you seen Soviet paintings? Look
at the hearty ankles on these socialist comrade peasants.
Also because the Soviets were atheists, at least in theory, Congress in 1954 added the
words “under God” to the pledge of allegiance as a sign of America’s resistance to communism.
The Cold War also shaped domestic policy–anti-communist sentiment, for instance, prevented Truman
from extending the social policies of the New Deal.
The program that he dubbed the Fair Deal would have increased the minimum wage, extended
national health insurance and increased public housing, Social Security and aid to education.
But the American Medical Association lobbied against Truman’s plan for national health
insurance by calling it “socialized” medicine, and Congress was in no mood to pay money for
socialized anything. That problem goes away.
But the government did make some domestic investments as a result of the Cold War–in
the name of national security the government spent money on education, research in science,
technology like computers, and transportation infrastructure. In fact we largely have the
Cold War to thank for our marvelous interstate highway system, although part of the reason
Congress approved it was to set up speedy evacuation routes in the event of nuclear
war. And, speaking of nuclear war, it’s worth
noting that a big part of the reason the Soviets were able to develop nuclear weapons so quickly
was thanks to espionage, like for instance by physicist and spy Klaus Fuchs. I think
I’m pronouncing that right. Fuchs worked on the Manhattan Project and
leaked information to the Soviets and then later helped the Chinese to build their first
bomb. Julius Rosenberg also gave atomic secrets to the Soviets, and was eventually executed–as
was his less-clearly-guilty wife, Ethel. And it’s important to remember all that
when thinking about the United States’s obsessive fear that there were communists
in our midst. This began in 1947 with Truman’s Loyalty Review System, which required government
employees to prove their patriotism when accused of disloyalty.
How do you prove your loyalty? Rat out your co-workers as communists. No seriously though,
that program never found any communists. This all culminated of course with the Red
Scare and the rise of Wisconsin senator Joseph McCarthy, an inveterate liar who became enormously
powerful after announcing in February 1950 that he had a list of 205 communists who worked
in the state department In fact, he had no such thing, and McCarthy
never identified a single disloyal American, but the fear of communism continued. In 1951’s
Dennis v. United States, the Supreme Court upheld the notion that being a communist leader
itself was a crime. In this climate of fear, any criticism of
the government and its policies or the U.S. in general was seen as disloyalty. There was
only one question–when will I be blown up–and it encouraged loyalty, because only the government
could prevent the spread of communism and keep us from being blown up.
We’ve talked a lot about different ways that Americans have imagined freedom this
year, but this was a new definition of freedom–the government exists in part to keep us free
from massive destruction. So, the Cold War changed America profoundly:
The U.S. has remained a leader on the world stage and continued to build a large, powerful,
and expensive national state. But it also changed the way we imagine what it means to
be free, and what it means to be safe. Thanks for watching. I’ll see you next week.
Crash Course is created by all of these nice people and it is possible because of you and
your support through Subbable.com. Subbable is a crowdfunding website that allows
you to support the stuff you love on a monthly basis. Our Subbable subscribers make this
show possible. Thanks to them. If you value Crash Course,
please check out our Subbable. There are great perks there. And thanks to all of you for
watching. As we say in my hometown, don’t forget to be awesome…Wait, wait, wait,
Stan, is that music copyrighted? All right! It's not! Woo!
That saved us a thousand dollars. .

Ch 27 Cold War – .