World News Headlines

Coverage of breaking stories

Which agency monitors political campaign donations?

source : yahoo.com

Which agency monitors political campaign donations?

Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and the Yahoo Answers website is now in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Which agency monitors political campaign donations? - Brainly.com

Which agency monitors political campaign donations? – Brainly.com – Find an answer to your question Which agency monitors political campaign donations? A. Economic Adjustment Office B. Bureau taskmasters taskmasters. "Federal Election Commission" is the one agency among the choices given in the question that monitors political campaign donations.By law, campaigns and political action committees must disclose the personal details of individuals who donate $200 or more, including their names, addresses and employers. For each company, the site aggregated the contributions of every employee whose donations were publicly available.Which agency monitors political campaign donations? A. Economic Adjustment Office B. Bureau of Economic Analysis C. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation D. Federal Reserve System E. Federal Election Commission.

How to find out if CEOs have donated to political campaigns – Money makes the world of politics go 'round, and this campaign season is no exception. Please note that organizations are only allowed to donate to political action committees (PACs) or other groups not associated with a particular candidate, and these donations are referred to as "outside…Politics and Government. Which agency monitors political campaign donations? The Federal Election Commission monitors campaign financing and maintains all financial reports. The agency maintains a website with a lot of online information regarding House, Senate, and Presidential…Information about Victorian regulations on political donations, including obligations for The agency responsible for monitoring the submission of local council candidate campaign donation Federal election campaign donations are regulated by Part XX of the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918.

How to find out if CEOs have donated to political campaigns

Select the correct answer. Which agency monitors political… – Crissy Thomas asked in Politics & Government. Civic Participation · 8 years ago. Which agency monitors political campaign donations?Find and compare top Political Campaign software on Capterra, with our free and interactive tool. Quickly browse through hundreds of Political Campaign tools and systems Find the best Political Campaign Software for your business. Compare product reviews and features to build your list.PACs receiving the donations include the National Victory Action Fund, the Georgia Action Fund, the Better Future Michigan Fund and the Congressional Here's a look at 10 companies — and the people behind them — that made some of the biggest political donations during the 2020 election cycle.

South Haven Tribune - Schools, Education 6.26.17Bangor ...
2019: EFCC to monitor donations to political parties ...
FREEDOMFIGHTERS FOR AMERICA - THIS ORGANIZATION EXPOSING ...
17 marketing campaigns with a positive message for women ...
Donald Trump accused of 'flagrant' violations of election ...
France targeted for giving m to Palestinian group ...
Greitens' political nonprofits take center stage in ...
Yahoo News - Latest News & Headlines
Political donations to state attorney generals as Juul ...
Collect Non-Profit Donations: Campaign Launchpad
Greitens' political nonprofits take center stage in ...

The Politics of Media Development with Silvio Waisbord – .

Are Trump’s Efforts to Sabotage Iran Nuclear Deal a Precursor for U.S. War with Iran? – AMY GOODMAN: Here on Democracy Now!, democracynow.org,
The War and Peace Report, I'm Amy Goodman.
Amidst the news of the Nobel Peace Prize being
awarded to the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons, we turn to look at whether
President Trump is trying to sabotage the Obama-brokered nuclear agreement with Iran
and seek a war with Iran. According to The Washington Post, Trump is
expected to announce next week the deal is not in the U.S. national interest, and will
move to decertify the deal. If this happens, Congress will decide whether
or not to reinstate harsh economic sanctions against Iran, potentially tanking the landmark
deal. The move comes despite the fact the Trump
administration begrudgingly certified that Iran has complied with its obligations under
the agreement earlier this year. Also, the International Atomic Energy Agency
has said this, which closely monitors Iran’s activities. Speaking to the U.N. General Assembly last
month, President Trump slammed the Iran nuclear deal. PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: The Iran deal was
one of the worst and most one-sided transactions the United States has ever entered into. Frankly, that deal is an embarrassment to
the United States, and I don’t think you’ve heard the last of it, believe me. It is time for the entire world to join us
in demanding that Iran’s government end its pursuit of death and destruction. It is time for the regime to free all Americans
and citizens of other nations that they have unjustly detained. And, above all, Iran’s government must stop
supporting terrorists, begin serving its own people and respect the sovereign rights of
its neighbors. AMY GOODMAN: Meanwhile, on Thursday night,
Trump issued a cryptic threat during a meeting with military leaders, saying this is “the
calm before the storm.” PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: You guys know what
this represents? Maybe it’s the calm before the storm. REPORTER 1: What’s the storm, Mr. President? REPORTER 2: What does that mean? PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: Could be, the calm,
the calm before the storm. REPORTER 2: What storm, Mr. President? PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: We have the world’s
great military people in this room. I will tell you that. And we’re going to have a great evening. Thank you all for coming. Thank you.” REPORTER 2: What storm, Mr. President? PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: You’ll find out. AMY GOODMAN: “You’ll find out.” That’s what President Trump’s answer was
when reporters asked him about what he meant by his words, this is “the calm before the
storm,” Trump’s comments following his recent admonishment of his military leaders
during a Cabinet meeting, telling them, “Moving forward, I also expect you to provide me with
a broad range of military options, when needed, at a much faster pace,” unquote. If the Iran nuclear deal collapses, Iran can
begin producing uranium and reprocessing plutonium immediately, rather than waiting for 13 years
as required under the agreement. Both Secretary of State Rex Tillerson and
Defense Secretary Mattis have urged Trump to uphold the agreement. This is Mattis speaking to senators just Tuesday. DEFENSE SECRETARY JAMES MATTIS: If we can
confirm that Iran is living by the agreement, if we can determine that this is in our best
interest, then, clearly, we should stay with it. I believe, at this point in time, absent indications
to the contrary, it is something the president should consider staying with. AMY GOODMAN: The New York Times reports the
Trump administration plans to take a broader hard-line stance toward Iran, including cracking
down on the country’s ballistic missile program and its alleged involvement in Syria,
Yemen and elsewhere in the Middle East. For more, we go to Tehran, Iran, where we’re
joined by Democracy Now! video stream by Reza Sayah, a freelance journalist
who covered Iran for CNN International for over seven years. After his coverage of the 2009 anti-government
protests, Iranian authorities denied him permission to work there for two years. Sayah later returned to Tehran to report on
the ongoing nuclear talks, the 2013 presidential elections, the signing of the interim nuclear
deal and, most recently, the 2017 Iranian presidential elections. Welcome to Democracy Now! Let’s start off just by asking your response
to this news that President Trump will decertify the Iran nuclear deal next week. How have people responded in Iran? REZA SAYAH: Amy, first off, let’s pass along
some new information. I just spoke an hour ago by phone to Bahram
Ghassemi, the spokesperson of the Foreign Ministry. He’s aware of the report by The Washington
Post last night. He said he’s going to reserve comment until
the Trump administration makes an official announcement. As far as this news goes, I think a lot of
people were curious what Mr. Trump was going to decide next week. I think a lot of people were eager to hear
what he was going to decide. They weren’t sure. Obviously, throughout his campaign for the
presidency, he was speaking out against this deal, calling it the worst deal ever, an embarrassment. That kind of rhetoric continued through the
early months of his presidency; after his meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin
Netanyahu, came out with statements suggesting that he was going to go after this deal. And indications are that the stage is set
for Mr. Trump to make an effort to, at the very least, undermine, destabilize and weaken
this deal. What’s striking is this, that the entire
international community, all other members of the P5+1, all other world powers, the IAEA,
the U.N.'s nuclear watchdog, all of these governments, all of these states, all of these
groups, are saying that this deal is working, that the deal is fulfilling its narrow objective
of rolling back Iran's nuclear program. Essentially, it’s two countries that are
against this deal: the U.S., led by a Republican president, and the Israeli government, led
by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. And it looks like these two countries are
going to go against international consensus and, at the very least, weaken this deal. We’ll see what happens in the coming weeks. AMY GOODMAN: And the news that Jim Mattis,
who is the secretary of defense, said just Tuesday, in testimony before Congress, that
he supports the deal? Of course, the U.S. has said that Iran has
lived up to its part of the agreement. REZA SAYAH: Yeah, they have. And I think it’s going to be important to
see what happens in the coming weeks. There’s a few things to remember. First off, the U.S. does not have unilateral
authority to destroy this deal. This deal belongs to the U.N. Security Council,
the international community. It’s endorsed by the U.N. Security Council. And the certification process, whereby the
U.S. president every 90 days has to certify this agreement to the U.S. Congress, is not
part of this agreement. Iran used this as an internal matter with
the U.S. So Iran may not see this as a violation, may
not see decertification as a violation, and, therefore, may not take drastic measures to
respond, which could include restarting their nuclear program. So I think, in the coming days and weeks,
the key is what the announcement is going to be. Is there a strategy behind it? And in the 60 days where Congress has to decide
whether to reimpose unilateral nuclear-related sanctions, will they do that? Because if they do indeed do that, then it’s
very likely Iran will see this as a violation, and that could escalate things. AMY GOODMAN: And finally, what would renewed
sanctions mean against Iran for the people, for the economy? REZA SAYAH: I think it would mean a loss of
the glimmer of hope that they had back in 2015, when this was signed. The moderacy or the liberals were very much
hoping that this deal would lead to better relations with the West, with the international
community, that it would lead to a better economy. I think that hope will certainly erode. But in many ways, Iranians are used to this
kind of treatment. In many ways, they haven’t seen any tangible
benefits from this deal, because the economy hasn’t improved. And if this indeed unfolds in a way where
tensions escalate and the deal is undermined, I think they’ll see this as more evidence
that the intention of the U.S. government is to isolate—economically isolate and politically
isolate—a country like Iran. It doesn’t serve the U.S. interest. It’s not a client state like other countries
in the region—Saudi Arabia, Israel, to name two. AMY GOODMAN: Reza Sayah, I want to thank you
for being with us, freelance journalist based in Tehran, Iran, speaking to us there, covered
Iran for CNN International for over seven years, was denied permission to work in Iran
for two years. We’re also joined, in Washington, D.C.,
by Trita Parsi. Trita Parsi is the founder and president of
the National Iranian American Council. Trita, you’re author of Losing an Enemy:
Obama, Iran, and the Legacy of Diplomacy. What news do you have in Washington? It was The Washington Post that reports that
Trump will decertify the landmark deal, that is not just between the United States and
Iran, but between a number of countries, next week. And explain what that means, what role the
president plays and what role Congress plays. TRITA PARSI: Thank you, Amy. This was not entirely unexpected. People knew that the Trump administration
was looking for ways to get out of the deal. And much of the focus has been: Would Congress
reimpose sanctions once the president shifts this issue onto them? But I think a more important matter may actually
be what Trump himself chooses to do outside of the nuclear deal, once he has decertified—this
little comment he gave about that this is the calm before the storm. The buzz here is that there’s going to be
a very significant ramping up, an escalation, in the region against Iran, potentially including
shooting down Iranian airplanes, sinking Iranian ships in the Persian Gulf, targeting Iranian
troops or Iranian-allied troops in Iraq and in Syria. This has been the preference by some in Washington
for quite some time, a belief that the United States, for far too long, had not been tough
enough against the Iranians. This was also something that had been suggested
by some in the Pentagon to the Obama administration. It was rejected, mainly because of the belief
that this idea that you can have a small war with Iran is really not workable. How do you prevent a small war from becoming
a really big war? AMY GOODMAN: So, what will happen in Congress? What is your sense, being right there, covering
these issues extremely closely, what Congress will do? And the significance of President Trump pulling
out of this landmark Iran deal, despite the fact that the Trump administration has certified
that Iran has lived up to its side of the bargain, him pulling out right after the Nobel
Peace Prize is awarded to the International Campaign for the Abolition of Nuclear Weapons? TRITA PARSI: Yeah, so, before I go into Congress,
let me just say one thing. If we take a step back, for the last 37 years,
there’s really only been one example in which the United States has been able to change
in a significant way a core Iranian policy. And that has been through these nuclear negotiations. Everything else that has been tried, from
sanctions to pressure to sabotage to threats of war, have failed. The only success we have is this nuclear deal. So if the Trump administration is concerned
about Iranian policies in the region, then if it truly wishes to see a change there,
there is a proven path that can lead to that, which is additional negotiations. For it to choose to walk out of this nuclear
deal and then pursue a path that has a proven track record of failure, that can only really
make sense if you want to see an escalation that could lead to war. If that is not your intent, it really is baffling
as to why the president would be doing what he’s doing right now. Now, when it comes to Congress, Congress is
not eager to take on this issue. They already have too many issues on their
plate, and they have not really managed to address any of them effectively. But also, it’s easy for Congress to oppose
this nuclear deal in 2015, particularly amongst the Republicans, when they kind of understood
that their vote was inconsequential. At this point, they will own the disaster
that will follow if they reimpose sanctions that violate the deal and causes the deal’s
collapse. And this is causing a lot of second thought
in Congress right now, and the anger or frustration that exists that they feel that the president
is pushing this issue onto them instead. Choosing not to do anything doesn’t not
seem to be too likely, either, in Congress. So, there’s likely going to be some sort
of a measure. And the measure, then, that’s going to be
important to see, will it be a reimposition of the old sanctions, which would be a clear
violation of the deal, or are they going to try to find a third route that doesn’t violate
the deal explicitly, so that they can say, “Well, we’re not the ones responsible
for collapsing this deal”? AMY GOODMAN: Trita Parsi, I want to thank
you for being with us, president and founder of the National Iranian American Council,
author of the book Losing an Enemy: Obama, Iran, and the Legacy of Diplomacy. This is Democracy Now! When we come back, we go to Las Vegas. Stay with us. .

Shame Tempers Shopping For Friendlier Inspector General For Ryan Zinke | Rachel Maddow | MSNBC – YOU THOUGHT IT WAS GONE.
YOU HAD GOOD REASON TO BELIEVE YOU HAD GOOD REASON TO BELIEVE THAT SHAME WAS EXTINCT, BUT WE THAT SHAME WAS EXTINCT, BUT WE HAVE JUST TONIGHT STUMBLED UPON HAVE JUST TONIGHT STUMBLED UPON EVIDENCE OF SHAME, IF NOT EVIDENCE OF SHAME, IF NOT ACCOUNTABILITY. ACCOUNTABILITY. AT LEAST A LITTLE BIT OF SHAME AT LEAST A LITTLE BIT OF SHAME IN AMERICAN POLITICS. IN AMERICAN POLITICS. IT’S SO UNFAMILIAR, IT FEELS IT’S SO UNFAMILIAR, IT FEELS LIKE WE ARE COVERING SOMETHING LIKE WE ARE COVERING SOMETHING IN A FOREIGN LANGUAGE, BUT I IN A FOREIGN LANGUAGE, BUT I SWEAR THIS REALLY HAPPENED SWEAR THIS REALLY HAPPENED TODAY. TODAY. KNOCK ME OVER WITH A FEATHER. KNOCK ME OVER WITH A FEATHER. I SWEAR THIS HAPPENED. I SWEAR THIS HAPPENED. ALL RIGHT. ALL RIGHT. YOU MIGHT REMEMBER EARLY THIS YOU MIGHT REMEMBER EARLY THIS YEAR WE LEARNED THAT BEN CARSON, YEAR WE LEARNED THAT BEN CARSON, WHO HAD BEEN A REPUBLICAN WHO HAD BEEN A REPUBLICAN PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE, HE RAN PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE, HE RAN AGAINST TRUMP IN THE PRIMARY AND AGAINST TRUMP IN THE PRIMARY AND THEN HE ENDORSED TRUMP FOR THEN HE ENDORSED TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT AFTER HE DROPPED OUT PRESIDENT AFTER HE DROPPED OUT OF THE PRIMARIES, AND THEN TRUMP OF THE PRIMARIES, AND THEN TRUMP NAMED BEN CARSON TO HIS CABINET, NAMED BEN CARSON TO HIS CABINET, NAMED HIM SECRETARY OF HUD, NAMED HIM SECRETARY OF HUD, HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT. HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT. YOU MIGHT REMEMBER EARLY THIS YOU MIGHT REMEMBER EARLY THIS YEAR WE LEARNED THAT BEN CARSON, YEAR WE LEARNED THAT BEN CARSON, UPON MOVING INTO HUD AS THE HEAD UPON MOVING INTO HUD AS THE HEAD OF THAT NEW AGENCY, HE DECIDED OF THAT NEW AGENCY, HE DECIDED THAT HE NEEDED A ,000 TABLE THAT HE NEEDED A ,000 TABLE FOR HIS OFFICE. FOR HIS OFFICE. REMEMBER THAT? REMEMBER THAT? IT WAS KIND OF LIKE A DINING IT WAS KIND OF LIKE A DINING SET. SET. I’M NOT CLEAR WHY YOU’D NEED A I’M NOT CLEAR WHY YOU’D NEED A DINING SET IN YOUR OFFICE IF HE DINING SET IN YOUR OFFICE IF HE DINES IN HIS OFFICE? DINES IN HIS OFFICE? I DON’T KNOW. I DON’T KNOW. I DINE IN MY OFFICE, BUT I DO SO I DINE IN MY OFFICE, BUT I DO SO OVER THE KEYBOARD, OVER THE KEYBOARD, UNFORTUNATELY. UNFORTUNATELY. BUT BEN CARSON WANTED A ,000 BUT BEN CARSON WANTED A ,000 TABLE TO DINE. TABLE TO DINE. THE WAY THAT WEIRD LITTLE THE WAY THAT WEIRD LITTLE SCANDAL SHOOK OUT IS THAT A SCANDAL SHOOK OUT IS THAT A CAREER OFFICIAL AT HUD TOLD BEN CAREER OFFICIAL AT HUD TOLD BEN CARSON THAT HE COULDN’T DO THAT. CARSON THAT HE COULDN’T DO THAT. SHE WAS LIKE, LISTEN, THERE IS A SHE WAS LIKE, LISTEN, THERE IS A DOLLAR LIMIT ON WHAT YOU CAN DOLLAR LIMIT ON WHAT YOU CAN SPEND TO RENOVATE YOUR OFFICE. SPEND TO RENOVATE YOUR OFFICE. YOU’RE A PUBLIC SERVANT. YOU’RE A PUBLIC SERVANT. YOU’RE SPENDING TAXPAYER MONEY. YOU’RE SPENDING TAXPAYER MONEY. IT’S LIKE A ,000 LIMIT FOR YOU IT’S LIKE A ,000 LIMIT FOR YOU DOING RENOVATIONS FOR YOUR WHOLE DOING RENOVATIONS FOR YOUR WHOLE OFFICE. OFFICE. UNDER NO MATH COULD A ,000 UNDER NO MATH COULD A ,000 TABLE FIT UNDER THAT THRESHOLD TABLE FIT UNDER THAT THRESHOLD FOR RENOVATING YOUR OFFICE. FOR RENOVATING YOUR OFFICE. SO THIS CAREER OFFICIAL AT HUD SO THIS CAREER OFFICIAL AT HUD TOLD HIM NO, YOU CAN’T DO THAT. TOLD HIM NO, YOU CAN’T DO THAT. YOU’RE A PUBLIC OFFICIAL NOW. YOU’RE A PUBLIC OFFICIAL NOW. AND SO, OBVIOUSLY, THEY HAD TO AND SO, OBVIOUSLY, THEY HAD TO GET RID OF HER. GET RID OF HER. THEY GOT THAT CAREER OFFICIAL THEY GOT THAT CAREER OFFICIAL RIGHT OUT OF THERE, AND THEY RIGHT OUT OF THERE, AND THEY BROUGHT IN SOMEONE MORE AMENABLE BROUGHT IN SOMEONE MORE AMENABLE TO THE WAYS AND DESIRES AND TO THE WAYS AND DESIRES AND FURNITURE TASTES OF THIS NEW FURNITURE TASTES OF THIS NEW ADMINISTRATION. ADMINISTRATION. THEY BROUGHT IN SOMEONE WHO HAD THEY BROUGHT IN SOMEONE WHO HAD WORKED ON THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN. WORKED ON THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN. SHE’S A LAWYER. SHE’S A LAWYER. I BELIEVE SHE IS FROM QUEENS. I BELIEVE SHE IS FROM QUEENS. SHE HAD NO RELEVANT EXPERIENCE SHE HAD NO RELEVANT EXPERIENCE WHATSOEVER, BUT SHE’D WORKED ON WHATSOEVER, BUT SHE’D WORKED ON THE CAMPAIGN SO, THEY BROUGHT THE CAMPAIGN SO, THEY BROUGHT HER IN. HER IN. AND SHE TOOK A LOOK AT THAT AND SHE TOOK A LOOK AT THAT TABLE, AND THE WAY SHE SAW IT, TABLE, AND THE WAY SHE SAW IT, SHE ACTUALLY SAW THAT AS QUITE A SHE ACTUALLY SAW THAT AS QUITE A LEGITIMATE EXPENSE. LEGITIMATE EXPENSE. SHE APPROVED IT. SHE APPROVED IT. IT’S NICE TO HAVE PEOPLE LIKE IT’S NICE TO HAVE PEOPLE LIKE THAT YOU CAN BRING IN WHEN YOU THAT YOU CAN BRING IN WHEN YOU NEED THEM. NEED THEM. AND TRUST ME, THERE ARE MANY AND TRUST ME, THERE ARE MANY INSTANCES WHEN NEED A PERSON INSTANCES WHEN NEED A PERSON LIKE THAT IN THE TRUMP LIKE THAT IN THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION. ADMINISTRATION. BEHOLD RYAN ZINKE. BEHOLD RYAN ZINKE. RYAN ZINKE WAS A REPUBLICAN OF RYAN ZINKE WAS A REPUBLICAN OF CONGRESS BEFORE TRUMP NAMED HIM CONGRESS BEFORE TRUMP NAMED HIM TO RUN THE DEPARTMENT OF TO RUN THE DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR. INTERIOR. ONE GETS THE SENSE FROM MR. ZINC ONE GETS THE SENSE FROM MR. ZINC ZINCY THAT HE WOULD LIKE TO MAKE ZINCY THAT HE WOULD LIKE TO MAKE THAT AS HIGH PROFILE. THAT AS HIGH PROFILE. HE RODE A HORSE TO WORK ON THE HE RODE A HORSE TO WORK ON THE FIRST DAY OF THE JOB. FIRST DAY OF THE JOB. HE USE FARE FUNDS TO STOP HE USE FARE FUNDS TO STOP TRAFFIC IN THAT ENTIRE PART OF TRAFFIC IN THAT ENTIRE PART OF WASHINGTON, D.C. SO HE COULD WASHINGTON, D.C. SO HE COULD SHOW UP ON A HORSE, BECAUSE HE SHOW UP ON A HORSE, BECAUSE HE THOUGHT THOUGHT THOUGHT. THOUGHT. ONCE HE DISMOUNTED AND MADE IT ONCE HE DISMOUNTED AND MADE IT INSIDE THE BUILDING, SECRETARY INSIDE THE BUILDING, SECRETARY SINKE WOULD V THAT A STAFF SINKE WOULD V THAT A STAFF MEMBER WOULD BE ASSIGNED TO RUN MEMBER WOULD BE ASSIGNED TO RUN TO THE ROOF OF THE BUILDING, TO TO THE ROOF OF THE BUILDING, TO RUN THAT UP THE FLAG POLE RUN THAT UP THE FLAG POLE WHENEVER RYAN ZINKE WAS AT HIS WHENEVER RYAN ZINKE WAS AT HIS DESK. DESK. SO EVERYBODY COULD TELL FROM A SO EVERYBODY COULD TELL FROM A DISTANCE OR MAYBE FROM A PASSING DISTANCE OR MAYBE FROM A PASSING PLANE THAT RYAN ZINKE WAS IN THE PLANE THAT RYAN ZINKE WAS IN THE HOUSE. HOUSE. IT HAS BEEN A SORT OF HALLMARK IT HAS BEEN A SORT OF HALLMARK OF RYAN ZINKE’S POLITICAL CAREER OF RYAN ZINKE’S POLITICAL CAREER THAT HE HAS SOMETIMES OVERDONE THAT HE HAS SOMETIMES OVERDONE IT A LITTLE BIT WITH THE IT A LITTLE BIT WITH THE VISUALS. VISUALS. WHEN HE WAS RUNNING FOR WHEN HE WAS RUNNING FOR CONGRESS,INCH IRKED A LOT OF CONGRESS,INCH IRKED A LOT OF HIS REPUBLICANS BY PUTTING THE HIS REPUBLICANS BY PUTTING THE TRIDENT SIGN ON HIS CAMPAIGN BUS TRIDENT SIGN ON HIS CAMPAIGN BUS WHICH SORT OF IMPLIED THAT THE WHICH SORT OF IMPLIED THAT THE NAVY S.E.A.L.s WERE ENDORSING NAVY S.E.A.L.s WERE ENDORSING HIM AND HIS CANDIDACY. HIM AND HIS CANDIDACY. THAT WAS FURTHER COMPLICATED THAT WAS FURTHER COMPLICATED THAT IT ONLY EMERGED AFTER TRUMP THAT IT ONLY EMERGED AFTER TRUMP NOMINATED HIM FOR THIS CABINET NOMINATED HIM FOR THIS CABINET JOB, THAT WHAT ACTUALLY DERAILED JOB, THAT WHAT ACTUALLY DERAILED RYAN ZINKE’S CAREER IN THE NAVY RYAN ZINKE’S CAREER IN THE NAVY IS THAT HE GOT IN TROUBLE DURING IS THAT HE GOT IN TROUBLE DURING HIS TIME IN THE SERVICE. HIS TIME IN THE SERVICE. HE GOT IN TROUBLE SPECIFICALLY HE GOT IN TROUBLE SPECIFICALLY FOR CHISELING THE GOVERNMENT ON FOR CHISELING THE GOVERNMENT ON HIS TRAVEL EXPENSES. HIS TRAVEL EXPENSES. WHICH PERHAPS SHOULD HAVE BEEN A WHICH PERHAPS SHOULD HAVE BEEN A LITTLE BIT MORE OF A RED FLAG LITTLE BIT MORE OF A RED FLAG THAN THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION THAN THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION WAS PREPARED TO NOTICE WHEN THEY WAS PREPARED TO NOTICE WHEN THEY NOMINATED HIM FOR CABINET. NOMINATED HIM FOR CABINET. BUT THEY NOMINATED HIM AND HE BUT THEY NOMINATED HIM AND HE GOT THROUGH. GOT THROUGH. AND SINCE RYAN ZINKE GOT THAT AND SINCE RYAN ZINKE GOT THAT JOB AT THE INTERIOR DEPARTMENT, JOB AT THE INTERIOR DEPARTMENT, HE HAS HAD TAXPAYERS PAY FOR A HE HAS HAD TAXPAYERS PAY FOR A PRIVATE JET FLIGHT ON AN PRIVATE JET FLIGHT ON AN AIRCRAFT OWNED BY AN EXECUTIVE AIRCRAFT OWNED BY AN EXECUTIVE FROM AN OIL AND GAS COMPANY IN FROM AN OIL AND GAS COMPANY IN WYOMING AFTER HE GAVE A WYOMING AFTER HE GAVE A MOTIVATIONAL SPEECH IN LAS VEGAS MOTIVATIONAL SPEECH IN LAS VEGAS TO A HOCKEY TEAM OWNED BY ONE OF TO A HOCKEY TEAM OWNED BY ONE OF HIS BIGGEST CAMPAIGN DONORS, HE HIS BIGGEST CAMPAIGN DONORS, HE TOOK THAT PRIVATE JET RIDE FROM TOOK THAT PRIVATE JET RIDE FROM LAS VEGAS BACK TO HIS HOUSE IN LAS VEGAS BACK TO HIS HOUSE IN MONTANA. MONTANA. HE’S ALSO CHARGED TAXPAYERS TO HE’S ALSO CHARGED TAXPAYERS TO PAY FOR HIS PRIVATE JET FLIGHTS PAY FOR HIS PRIVATE JET FLIGHTS TO REPUBLICAN FUNDRAISERS. TO REPUBLICAN FUNDRAISERS. AND THEN THERE IS THE AND THEN THERE IS THE MULTIPRIVATE JET FLIGHTS HE MULTIPRIVATE JET FLIGHTS HE CHARGED TO U.S. TAXPAYERS FOR CHARGED TO U.S. TAXPAYERS FOR FLIGHTS TO AND AROUND THE U.S. FLIGHTS TO AND AROUND THE U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS, INCLUDING FOR VIRGIN ISLANDS, INCLUDING FOR WHAT SOUNDS LIKE A SUPER AWESOME WHAT SOUNDS LIKE A SUPER AWESOME SNORKELING TOUR. SNORKELING TOUR. TAXPAYERS PAID TO FLY HIM TO TAXPAYERS PAID TO FLY HIM TO THAT ON A CHARTERED JET. THAT ON A CHARTERED JET. ULTIMATELY, TRUMP HEALTH ULTIMATELY, TRUMP HEALTH SECRETARY TOM PRICE, WHO HAD TO SECRETARY TOM PRICE, WHO HAD TO RESIGN IN DISGRACE, AND THEN RESIGN IN DISGRACE, AND THEN TRUMP’S EPA ADMINISTRATOR SCOTT TRUMP’S EPA ADMINISTRATOR SCOTT PRUITT, WHO HAD TO RESIGN IN PRUITT, WHO HAD TO RESIGN IN DISGRACE, THEY’VE SORT OF GOTTEN DISGRACE, THEY’VE SORT OF GOTTEN ALL THE GLORY FOR BEING THE MOST ALL THE GLORY FOR BEING THE MOST FLAMBOYANTLY UNSUSTAINABLY FLAMBOYANTLY UNSUSTAINABLY CORRUPT MEMBERS OF THE TRUMP CORRUPT MEMBERS OF THE TRUMP CABINET. CABINET. BUT RYAN ZINKE HAS ALWAYS BEEN A BUT RYAN ZINKE HAS ALWAYS BEEN A CONTENDER. CONTENDER. DO NOT COUNT HIM OUT. DO NOT COUNT HIM OUT. HIS BEHAVIOR IN OFFICE LED HIS BEHAVIOR IN OFFICE LED ULTIMATELY TO THE INDEPENDENT ULTIMATELY TO THE INDEPENDENT INSPECTOR GENERAL AT THE INSPECTOR GENERAL AT THE INTERIOR DEPARTMENT STARTING INTERIOR DEPARTMENT STARTING FOUR DIFFERENT SIMULTANEOUSLY FOUR DIFFERENT SIMULTANEOUSLY ETHICS INVESTIGATIONS INTO ETHICS INVESTIGATIONS INTO ZINKE’S BEHAVIOR SINCE HE’S BEEN ZINKE’S BEHAVIOR SINCE HE’S BEEN RUNNING THAT AGENCY. RUNNING THAT AGENCY. NOW IF YOU’RE THE TRUMP NOW IF YOU’RE THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION, THAT JUST SEEMS ADMINISTRATION, THAT JUST SEEMS LIKE A TERRIBLE IDEA, RIGHT? LIKE A TERRIBLE IDEA, RIGHT? AN INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION OF AN INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION OF RYAN ZINKE? RYAN ZINKE? WHY WOULD WE ALLOW THAT? WHY WOULD WE ALLOW THAT? WHY ARE WE ALLOWING THAT? WHY ARE WE ALLOWING THAT? WHY WOULD WE LET THAT GO WHY WOULD WE LET THAT GO FORWARD? FORWARD? HEY, WHERE IS THE DINING SET HEY, WHERE IS THE DINING SET LADY? LADY? WHAT’S SHE DOING NOW? WHAT’S SHE DOING NOW? COULDN’T WE GET HER TO FIX THIS COULDN’T WE GET HER TO FIX THIS TOO? TOO? THAT IS LITERALLY WHAT THEY THAT IS LITERALLY WHAT THEY TRIED TO DO. TRIED TO DO. TWO DAYS AGO, "THE HILL" TWO DAYS AGO, "THE HILL" NEWSPAPER WAS FIRST TO REPORT ON NEWSPAPER WAS FIRST TO REPORT ON AN E-MAIL FROM HUD DINING SET AN E-MAIL FROM HUD DINING SET SECRETARY BEN CARSON SECRETARY BEN CARSON CONGRATULATING THIS WOMAN, WHO CONGRATULATING THIS WOMAN, WHO HAD WORKED ON THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN HAD WORKED ON THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN AND WHO WORKED IN CARSON’S AND WHO WORKED IN CARSON’S OFFICE. OFFICE. THE E-MAIL WAS CONGRATULATING THE E-MAIL WAS CONGRATULATING HER ON HER GRADUATING FROM BEN HER ON HER GRADUATING FROM BEN CARSON’S OFFICE AT HUD, WHICH IS CARSON’S OFFICE AT HUD, WHICH IS WHERE SHE APPROVED THE DINING WHERE SHE APPROVED THE DINING SET. SET. HE WAS SENDING THIS E-MAIL TO HE WAS SENDING THIS E-MAIL TO LET EVERYBODY IN THE AGENCY KNOW LET EVERYBODY IN THE AGENCY KNOW THAT SHE WAS ON HER WAY OUT THAT SHE WAS ON HER WAY OUT BECAUSE SHE WAS MOVING UP, BECAUSE SHE WAS MOVING UP, BECAUSE SHE WAS GETTING WHAT IS BECAUSE SHE WAS GETTING WHAT IS ACTUALLY A REALLY SERIOUS AND ACTUALLY A REALLY SERIOUS AND PRESTIGIOUS JOB. PRESTIGIOUS JOB. BEN CARSON’S E-MAIL, AGAIN, BEN CARSON’S E-MAIL, AGAIN, FIRST REPORTED TWO DAYS AGO FIRST REPORTED TWO DAYS AGO ANNOUNCED THAT THIS WOMAN FROM ANNOUNCED THAT THIS WOMAN FROM HIS OFFICE WOULD NOW BE LEAVING HIS OFFICE WOULD NOW BE LEAVING HUD, AND SHE WOULD BE MOVING HUD, AND SHE WOULD BE MOVING OVER TO THE DEPARTMENT OF OVER TO THE DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR TO BECOME THE INTERIOR TO BECOME THE INDEPENDENT INSPECTOR GENERAL OF INDEPENDENT INSPECTOR GENERAL OF THE INTERIOR DEPARTMENT. THE INTERIOR DEPARTMENT. WOW. WOW. THAT IS A BIG PROMOTION. THAT IS A BIG PROMOTION. NOW, THERE ARE OBVIOUSLY A FEW NOW, THERE ARE OBVIOUSLY A FEW LITTLE PROBLEMS WITH THE IDEA OF LITTLE PROBLEMS WITH THE IDEA OF THIS PERSON BECOMING THE THIS PERSON BECOMING THE INSPECTOR GENERAL AT RYAN INSPECTOR GENERAL AT RYAN ZINKE’S AGENCY. ZINKE’S AGENCY. NUMBER ONE, SHE’S THE DINING SET NUMBER ONE, SHE’S THE DINING SET PERSON. PERSON. SHE REALLY IS THE PERSON WHO WAS SHE REALLY IS THE PERSON WHO WAS BROUGHT IN TO EXCUSE BEN BROUGHT IN TO EXCUSE BEN CARSON’S ,000 TABLE AND THE CARSON’S ,000 TABLE AND THE CORRUPTION AND ETHICS AND WASTE CORRUPTION AND ETHICS AND WASTE PROBLEMS THEREIN. PROBLEMS THEREIN. THAT’S NOT A GREAT BACKGROUND THAT’S NOT A GREAT BACKGROUND FOR AN INSPECTOR GENERAL WHOSE FOR AN INSPECTOR GENERAL WHOSE SUPPOSED TO FERRET THAT KIND OF SUPPOSED TO FERRET THAT KIND OF STUFF OUT. STUFF OUT. NUMBER TWO, SHE HAS ABSOLUTELY NUMBER TWO, SHE HAS ABSOLUTELY ZERO EXPERIENCE IN ANYTHING ZERO EXPERIENCE IN ANYTHING RELATED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF RELATED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR. INTERIOR. MORE IMPORTANTLY, NUMBER THREE, MORE IMPORTANTLY, NUMBER THREE, SHE HAS ABSOLUTELY ZERO SHE HAS ABSOLUTELY ZERO EXPERIENCE WHEN IT COMES TO EXPERIENCE WHEN IT COMES TO INVESTIGATIONS OF ANY KIND. INVESTIGATIONS OF ANY KIND. SO DID YOU SAY THERE ARE FOUR SO DID YOU SAY THERE ARE FOUR ACTIVE SIMULTANEOUS ETHICS ACTIVE SIMULTANEOUS ETHICS INVESTIGATIONS INTO RYAN ZINKE? INVESTIGATIONS INTO RYAN ZINKE? WELL, THIS PERSON WILL BE WELL, THIS PERSON WILL BE PERFECT. PERFECT. BRING HER IN! BRING HER IN! SO BEN CARSON MAKES THIS SO BEN CARSON MAKES THIS ANNOUNCEMENT TO HIS STAFF, WE’RE ANNOUNCEMENT TO HIS STAFF, WE’RE SO SORRY TO SEE YOU GO, YOU’LL SO SORRY TO SEE YOU GO, YOU’LL BE GREAT AT YOUR INSPECTOR BE GREAT AT YOUR INSPECTOR GENERAL JOB AT THE INTERIOR GENERAL JOB AT THE INTERIOR DEPARTMENT. DEPARTMENT. CONGRATULATIONS. CONGRATULATIONS. MEANWHILE, THE ACTUAL INSPECTOR MEANWHILE, THE ACTUAL INSPECTOR GENERAL AT THE INTERIOR GENERAL AT THE INTERIOR DEPARTMENT, THE ONE WHOSE DOING DEPARTMENT, THE ONE WHOSE DOING THESE FOUR SIMULTANEOUS THESE FOUR SIMULTANEOUS INVESTIGATIONS OF ZINKE, SHE INVESTIGATIONS OF ZINKE, SHE LEARNS ABOUT THIS WHEN A LEARNS ABOUT THIS WHEN A COLLEAGUE SHOWS HER BEN CARSON’S COLLEAGUE SHOWS HER BEN CARSON’S E-MAIL. E-MAIL. THAT’S HOW SHE LEARNS THE NEWS THAT’S HOW SHE LEARNS THE NEWS THAT SOMEBODY NEW IS APPARENTLY THAT SOMEBODY NEW IS APPARENTLY COMING ON OVER TO TAKE HER JOB. COMING ON OVER TO TAKE HER JOB. TO HER CREDIT, SHE BASICALLY TO HER CREDIT, SHE BASICALLY REFUSED TO ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THAT REFUSED TO ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THAT WAS ANY REAL INDICATION THAT SHE WAS ANY REAL INDICATION THAT SHE HAD BEEN FIRED. HAD BEEN FIRED. SHE CONTINUED ON, WAITING TO SHE CONTINUED ON, WAITING TO ACTUALLY HEAR OFFICIALLY THAT ACTUALLY HEAR OFFICIALLY THAT SHE WAS OUT OF A JOB. SHE WAS OUT OF A JOB. BUT FOR THE PAST COUPLE OF DAYS, BUT FOR THE PAST COUPLE OF DAYS, WHERE IT LOOKED LIKE THIS WAS WHERE IT LOOKED LIKE THIS WAS GOING WAS THAT THE U.S. FEDERAL GOING WAS THAT THE U.S. FEDERAL GOVERNMENT UNDER THIS PRESIDENT GOVERNMENT UNDER THIS PRESIDENT WAS GOING TO HIT YET ANOTHER NEW WAS GOING TO HIT YET ANOTHER NEW LOW, RIGHT? LOW, RIGHT? WHEN IT COMES TO THE TOLERANCE WHEN IT COMES TO THE TOLERANCE OF AND EVEN THE CELEBRATION OF OF AND EVEN THE CELEBRATION OF JUST RANK CORRUPTION, RIGHT? JUST RANK CORRUPTION, RIGHT? WE’VE GOT A EXPERIENCED WE’VE GOT A EXPERIENCED INSPECTOR GENERAL RUNNING FOUR INSPECTOR GENERAL RUNNING FOUR INVESTIGATIONS INTO A TRUMP INVESTIGATIONS INTO A TRUMP CABINET SECRETARY. CABINET SECRETARY. SHE IS GOING TO GET FIRED. SHE IS GOING TO GET FIRED. SHE IS GOING TO BE REPLACE BY SHE IS GOING TO BE REPLACE BY SOMEONE WITH NO EXPERIENCE SOMEONE WITH NO EXPERIENCE WHATSOEVER EXCEPT FOR THIS WHATSOEVER EXCEPT FOR THIS PERSON HAS WORKED FOR TRUMP PERSON HAS WORKED FOR TRUMP CAMPAIGN AND HELPED THEM COVER CAMPAIGN AND HELPED THEM COVER UP ETHICS SCANDALS BEFORE. UP ETHICS SCANDALS BEFORE. FOR THE LAST COUPLE DAY, THAT FOR THE LAST COUPLE DAY, THAT LOOKED LIKE THIS WAS WHERE THIS LOOKED LIKE THIS WAS WHERE THIS WAS DEFINITELY HEADING. WAS DEFINITELY HEADING. BUT THEN, BUT THEN SHAME WOKE BUT THEN, BUT THEN SHAME WOKE UP. UP. DEMOCRATS ON THE COMMITTEE IN DEMOCRATS ON THE COMMITTEE IN CONGRESS THAT OVERSEES THE CONGRESS THAT OVERSEES THE INTERIOR DEPARTMENT, THEY WROTE INTERIOR DEPARTMENT, THEY WROTE TO ONE IS BASICALLY THE TO ONE IS BASICALLY THE ASSOCIATION OF INSPECTORS ASSOCIATION OF INSPECTORS GENERAL IN THE U.S. GOVERNMENT. GENERAL IN THE U.S. GOVERNMENT. THE REASON AN ASSOCIATION LIKE THE REASON AN ASSOCIATION LIKE THAT EXISTS IS BECAUSE BEING THAT EXISTS IS BECAUSE BEING INSPECTOR GENERAL AT A CABINET INSPECTOR GENERAL AT A CABINET LEVEL AGENCY, IT’S A BIG DEAL. LEVEL AGENCY, IT’S A BIG DEAL. INSPECTORS GENERAL HAVE A LOT OF INSPECTORS GENERAL HAVE A LOT OF POWER. POWER. IT’S A VERY SERIOUS JOB. IT’S A VERY SERIOUS JOB. IT’S A JOB FOR WHICH IT’S A JOB FOR WHICH INDEPENDENTS AND PROFESSIONALISM INDEPENDENTS AND PROFESSIONALISM ARE SEEN AS ABSOLUTELY ARE SEEN AS ABSOLUTELY PARAMOUNT. PARAMOUNT. AND BECAUSE OF THAT, TO A AND BECAUSE OF THAT, TO A CERTAIN EXTENT, THE INSPECTOR CERTAIN EXTENT, THE INSPECTOR GENERAL COMMUNITY THAT. GENERAL COMMUNITY THAT. >> KIND OF SELF-POLICE. >> KIND OF SELF-POLICE. THEY HAVE AN ASSOCIATION. THEY HAVE AN ASSOCIATION. THEY TRY TO MAKE SURE THAT THESE THEY TRY TO MAKE SURE THAT THESE IMPORTANT, SENSITIVE INSPECTOR IMPORTANT, SENSITIVE INSPECTOR GENERAL JOBS ONLY GO TO PEOPLE GENERAL JOBS ONLY GO TO PEOPLE WHO ARE CAPABLE OF DOING THAT WHO ARE CAPABLE OF DOING THAT KIND OF WORK, WHO HAVE RELEVANT KIND OF WORK, WHO HAVE RELEVANT EXPERIENCE, AND WHO CAN DO THAT EXPERIENCE, AND WHO CAN DO THAT WORK WITH UNIMPEACHABLE WORK WITH UNIMPEACHABLE INTEGRITY. INTEGRITY. SO THE DEMOCRATS, IT OCCURS TO SO THE DEMOCRATS, IT OCCURS TO THEM, HEY, MAYBE WE SHOULD WRITE THEM, HEY, MAYBE WE SHOULD WRITE TO THE ASSOCIATIONS OF TO THE ASSOCIATIONS OF INSPECTORS GENERAL AND SAY HEY, INSPECTORS GENERAL AND SAY HEY, THE DINING ROOM SET FROM BEN THE DINING ROOM SET FROM BEN CARSON’S OFFICE, REALLY? CARSON’S OFFICE, REALLY? SHE IS GOING TO BE AN INSPECTOR SHE IS GOING TO BE AN INSPECTOR GENERAL NOW FOR A CABINET GENERAL NOW FOR A CABINET AGENCY? AGENCY? THAT’S NOT HOW THEY PUT IT. THAT’S NOT HOW THEY PUT IT. THEY PUT IT THIS WAY. THEY PUT IT THIS WAY. QUOTE, THE MERE THREAT OF QUOTE, THE MERE THREAT OF REPLACING AN INSPECTOR GENERAL REPLACING AN INSPECTOR GENERAL WHEN THE HEAD OF THE AGENCY IT WHEN THE HEAD OF THE AGENCY IT OVERSEES IS UNDER HEAVY SCRUTINY OVERSEES IS UNDER HEAVY SCRUTINY WILL SEND A SIGNAL TO CURRENT WILL SEND A SIGNAL TO CURRENT AND FUTURE IGs THROUGHOUT THE AND FUTURE IGs THROUGHOUT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT THAT RELEASE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT THAT RELEASE UNFAVORABLE FINDINGS MAY UNFAVORABLE FINDINGS MAY THREATEN THEIR JOB. THREATEN THEIR JOB. QUOTE, IT CREATES A PERMANENT QUOTE, IT CREATES A PERMANENT DISINCENTIVE FOR THE CANDOR DISINCENTIVE FOR THE CANDOR REQUIRED FOR AN EFFECTIVE IG AND REQUIRED FOR AN EFFECTIVE IG AND SEVERS THE INDEPENDENCE THAT IS SEVERS THE INDEPENDENCE THAT IS THE FOUNDATION OF EFFECTIVE THE FOUNDATION OF EFFECTIVE OVERSIGHT OVER GOVERNMENT WASTE, OVERSIGHT OVER GOVERNMENT WASTE, FRAUD AND ABUSE. FRAUD AND ABUSE. SO THEY SEND THAT OFF. SO THEY SEND THAT OFF. I KNOW YOU’RE THINKING AT THIS I KNOW YOU’RE THINKING AT THIS POINT, AWE, DEMOCRATS. POINT, AWE, DEMOCRATS. THAT’S CUTE, RIGHT? THAT’S CUTE, RIGHT? YOU’RE IN THE MINORITY OF THE YOU’RE IN THE MINORITY OF THE HOUSE WHICH MEANS YOU HAVE NO HOUSE WHICH MEANS YOU HAVE NO POWER. POWER. REPUBLICANS CLEARLY DO NOT CARE REPUBLICANS CLEARLY DO NOT CARE ABOUT THIS WHEN IT’S A ABOUT THIS WHEN IT’S A REPUBLICAN ADMINISTRATION DOING REPUBLICAN ADMINISTRATION DOING IT. IT. THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION GETS THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION GETS AWAY WITH STUFF LIKE THIS AND AWAY WITH STUFF LIKE THIS AND WORSE ON A DAILY BASIS, RIGHT? WORSE ON A DAILY BASIS, RIGHT? UNDER THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION, UNDER THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION, THEY HAVE VERY QUICKLY THEY HAVE VERY QUICKLY COMPLETELY DEGRADED ANY IDEAS OR COMPLETELY DEGRADED ANY IDEAS OR EXPECTATIONS THAT WE HAVE ABOUT EXPECTATIONS THAT WE HAVE ABOUT CORRUPTION AND ABUSE AND CORRUPTION AND ABUSE AND NEPOTISM AND CONFLICTS OF NEPOTISM AND CONFLICTS OF INTEREST. INTEREST. SO, YOU KNOW, WHY BOTHER? SO, YOU KNOW, WHY BOTHER? WELL, YOU BOTHER BECAUSE WELL, YOU BOTHER BECAUSE SOMETIMES IT WORKS. SOMETIMES IT WORKS. AND IN THIS CASE, LO AND BEHOLD, AND IN THIS CASE, LO AND BEHOLD, SHAME MAKES AN APPEARANCE. SHAME MAKES AN APPEARANCE. IN THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION. IN THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION. I MEAN KIND OF. I MEAN KIND OF. THEY’RE NOT, OF COURSE, THEY’RE NOT, OF COURSE, SHAME-FACEDLY ADMITTING WHAT SHAME-FACEDLY ADMITTING WHAT THEY WERE TRYING TO GET AWAY THEY WERE TRYING TO GET AWAY WITH HERE. WITH HERE. BUT THEY DID GET CAUGHT HERE. BUT THEY DID GET CAUGHT HERE. THEY GOT CONFRONTED ABOUT IT, THEY GOT CONFRONTED ABOUT IT, AND NOW THEY HAVE ENDED UP AND NOW THEY HAVE ENDED UP CLIMBING DOWN. CLIMBING DOWN. YOU MIGHT HAVE SEEN THIS YOU MIGHT HAVE SEEN THIS HEADLINE IN "THE WASHINGTON HEADLINE IN "THE WASHINGTON POST" TODAY. POST" TODAY. TRUMP ADMINISTRATION DOES TRUMP ADMINISTRATION DOES ABOUT-FACE ON ITS OWN ABOUT-FACE ON ITS OWN ANNOUNCEMENT THAT TOP AIDE AT ANNOUNCEMENT THAT TOP AIDE AT HUD WOULD BE INTERIOR’S HUD WOULD BE INTERIOR’S WATCHDOG. WATCHDOG. THAT’S A LOT OF WORDS, BUT IT THAT’S A LOT OF WORDS, BUT IT MEANS THEY GAVE UP ON THIS MEANS THEY GAVE UP ON THIS SCHEME. SCHEME. THE WAY THEY HAVE DECIDED TO GET THE WAY THEY HAVE DECIDED TO GET OUT OF THIS, TO CLIMB DOWN FROM OUT OF THIS, TO CLIMB DOWN FROM THIS IS ZINKE’S OFFICE TELLING THIS IS ZINKE’S OFFICE TELLING REPORTERS THAT THIS WAS NEVER REPORTERS THAT THIS WAS NEVER THE PLAN. THE PLAN. WE DON’T KNOW WHAT YOU’RE WE DON’T KNOW WHAT YOU’RE TALKING ABOUT. TALKING ABOUT. WHY DO YOU THINK THAT WAS THE WHY DO YOU THINK THAT WAS THE PLAN? PLAN? OH, THAT BEN CARSON E-MAIL THAT OH, THAT BEN CARSON E-MAIL THAT SAID THIS WAS THE PLAN? SAID THIS WAS THE PLAN? THAT WAS JUST BEN CARSON THAT WAS JUST BEN CARSON SCREWING UP. SCREWING UP. ZINKE’S OFFICE PUT OUT AN E-MAIL ZINKE’S OFFICE PUT OUT AN E-MAIL TODAY THE E-MAIL FROM BEN TODAY THE E-MAIL FROM BEN CARSON’S OFFICE WAS, QUOTE, 100% CARSON’S OFFICE WAS, QUOTE, 100% FALSE INFORMATION WHEN HE SAID FALSE INFORMATION WHEN HE SAID THIS WOMAN WAS GOING TO BECOME THIS WOMAN WAS GOING TO BECOME INSPECTOR GENERAL. INSPECTOR GENERAL. THING IS WHAT SHAME LOOKS LIKE THING IS WHAT SHAME LOOKS LIKE FROM THESE GUYS. FROM THESE GUYS. STILL, PICK A FIGHT ABOUT IT. STILL, PICK A FIGHT ABOUT IT. BLAME SOMEONE ELSE. BLAME SOMEONE ELSE. PRETEND TO STILL BE ON OFFENSE. PRETEND TO STILL BE ON OFFENSE. BUT WHAT THEY WERE TRYING TO BUT WHAT THEY WERE TRYING TO PULL OFF WITH THIS INSPECTOR PULL OFF WITH THIS INSPECTOR GENERAL SWITCHEROO, THEY’RE NOW GENERAL SWITCHEROO, THEY’RE NOW NOT DOING IT. NOT DOING IT. SO TO THE DEMOCRATS WHO PUSHED SO TO THE DEMOCRATS WHO PUSHED ON THIS, THIS IS ONE OF THOSE ON THIS, THIS IS ONE OF THOSE RARE EXAMPLES THAT SHOWS THAT RARE EXAMPLES THAT SHOWS THAT FIGHTING OVER THE STUFF FIGHTING OVER THE STUFF SOMETIMES WORKS. SOMETIMES WORKS. YOU CAN’T WIN IF YOU DON’T PLAY. YOU CAN’T WIN IF YOU DON’T PLAY. RIGHT? RIGHT? EVEN WHEN IT SEEMS FUTILE. EVEN WHEN IT SEEMS FUTILE. I UNDERSTAND WHY IT SOMETIMES I UNDERSTAND WHY IT SOMETIMES SEEMS FUTILE. SEEMS FUTILE. WE ARE IN A NEW ERA WHERE THE WE ARE IN A NEW ERA WHERE THE PRESIDENT IS RETAINING HIS PRESIDENT IS RETAINING HIS PRIVATE BUSINESS INTERESTS AND PRIVATE BUSINESS INTERESTS AND KEEPING ALL OF HIS FINANCES KEEPING ALL OF HIS FINANCES SECRET, AND HE IS GIVING SENIOR SECRET, AND HE IS GIVING SENIOR JOBS TO HIS KIDS, AND HE HAS JOBS TO HIS KIDS, AND HE HAS HIRED CABINET OFFICIALS AND HIRED CABINET OFFICIALS AND SENIOR REGULATORY ADVISERS WHO SENIOR REGULATORY ADVISERS WHO CAME INTO GOVERNMENT SERVICE AND CAME INTO GOVERNMENT SERVICE AND IMMEDIATELY STARTED MAKING IMMEDIATELY STARTED MAKING POLICY TO BENEFIT THEIR OWN POLICY TO BENEFIT THEIR OWN BUSINESS INTERESTS WHICH THEY BUSINESS INTERESTS WHICH THEY THEN LIED ABOUT. THEN LIED ABOUT. I MEAN, IT’S EXHAUSTING, RIGHT? I MEAN, IT’S EXHAUSTING, RIGHT? IMAGINE ANY OTHER TIME IN U.S. IMAGINE ANY OTHER TIME IN U.S. HISTORY WHEN WE WOULD BE HEADING HISTORY WHEN WE WOULD BE HEADING INTO A CONGRESSIONAL ELECTION INTO A CONGRESSIONAL ELECTION WHILE THE PRESIDENT’S CAMPAIGN WHILE THE PRESIDENT’S CAMPAIGN CHAIR, DEPUTY CAMPAIGN CHAIR, CHAIR, DEPUTY CAMPAIGN CHAIR, NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISER, AND NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISER, AND LONG-TIME PERSONAL LAWYER ARE LONG-TIME PERSONAL LAWYER ARE ALL GOING TO PRISON. ALL GOING TO PRISON. THEY’RE ALL AWAITING SENTENCING, THEY’RE ALL AWAITING SENTENCING, EVEN BEFORE THIS PRESIDENCY MADE EVEN BEFORE THIS PRESIDENCY MADE IT TO ITS FIRST MIDTERM IT TO ITS FIRST MIDTERM ELECTION. ELECTION. WE’VE NEVER BEEN IN THIS DIRE A WE’VE NEVER BEEN IN THIS DIRE A PLACE IN TERMS OF ETHICS AND PLACE IN TERMS OF ETHICS AND CRIMINALITY, AND I’M INCLUDING CRIMINALITY, AND I’M INCLUDING WATERGATE AND TEAPOT DOME AND WATERGATE AND TEAPOT DOME AND EVERYTHING ELSE YOU CAN IMAGINE. EVERYTHING ELSE YOU CAN IMAGINE. BUT WHAT DO WE AS CITIZENS DO BUT WHAT DO WE AS CITIZENS DO ABOUT IT? ABOUT IT? AND WHAT DO WE WANT OUR PUBLIC AND WHAT DO WE WANT OUR PUBLIC OFFICIALS TO DO ABOUT IT? OFFICIALS TO DO ABOUT IT? THE SOLUTION CAN’T BE TO JUST THE SOLUTION CAN’T BE TO JUST LOWER THE BAR, GIVE UP YOUR LOWER THE BAR, GIVE UP YOUR EXPECTATIONS, THROW YOUR HANDS EXPECTATIONS, THROW YOUR HANDS UP AND ACCEPT, OKAY, THIS IS HOW UP AND ACCEPT, OKAY, THIS IS HOW CORRUPT AMERICA IS NOW. CORRUPT AMERICA IS NOW. I MEAN, UNLESS WE WANT TO GO I MEAN, UNLESS WE WANT TO GO DOWN IN HISTORY AS THE DOWN IN HISTORY AS THE GENERATION THAT SAID IT’S OKAY GENERATION THAT SAID IT’S OKAY FOR THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TO FOR THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TO BECOME QUICKLY MORE WILDLY AND BECOME QUICKLY MORE WILDLY AND FLAGRANTLY CORRUPT THAN IT HAS FLAGRANTLY CORRUPT THAN IT HAS EVER BEEN IN THIS COUNTRY SINCE EVER BEEN IN THIS COUNTRY SINCE OUR FOUNDING, IF WE DON’T WANT OUR FOUNDING, IF WE DON’T WANT TO BE THE GENERATION THAT TO BE THE GENERATION THAT DECIDED THAT WAS COOL AND WE DECIDED THAT WAS COOL AND WE WEREN’T GOING TO PEEP ABOUT IT, WEREN’T GOING TO PEEP ABOUT IT, THAT MEANS YOU DO HAVE TO FIGHT THAT MEANS YOU DO HAVE TO FIGHT ABOUT IT WHEN YOU FIND OUT ABOUT ABOUT IT WHEN YOU FIND OUT ABOUT CORRUPTION. CORRUPTION. EVEN WHEN YOU FIND OUT ABOUT EVEN WHEN YOU FIND OUT ABOUT SOME NEW ELEMENT OF IT EVERY SOME NEW ELEMENT OF IT EVERY DAY. DAY. YOU HAVE TO CRY FOUL. YOU HAVE TO CRY FOUL. YOU HAVE TO DENOUNCE IT AND PUT YOU HAVE TO DENOUNCE IT AND PUT UP A FIGHT. UP A FIGHT. NOT BECAUSE YOU’RE GOING WIN NOT BECAUSE YOU’RE GOING WIN EVERY TIME. EVERY TIME. YOU WON’T. YOU WON’T. BAURKSZ A, WE BAURKSZ A, WE BUT BECAUSE, A, WE ALL HAVE TO BUT BECAUSE, A, WE ALL HAVE TO ANSWER AT SOME POINT IN OUR ANSWER AT SOME POINT IN OUR LIVES. LIVES. AND YOU ARE COMPLICIT IF YOU AND YOU ARE COMPLICIT IF YOU DON’T SAY ANYTHING. DON’T SAY ANYTHING. AND B, MORE PRACTICALLY, IF YOU AND B, MORE PRACTICALLY, IF YOU DO CHOOSE TO FIGHT, EVERY ONCE DO CHOOSE TO FIGHT, EVERY ONCE IN A WHILE YOU MIGHT WIN. IN A WHILE YOU MIGHT WIN. AND SO TONIGHT THE INSPECTOR AND SO TONIGHT THE INSPECTOR GENERAL’S OFFICE AT THE INTERIOR GENERAL’S OFFICE AT THE INTERIOR DEPARTMENT, WHICH IS STILL DEPARTMENT, WHICH IS STILL INTACT, THEY HAVE STARTED TO INTACT, THEY HAVE STARTED TO RELEASE SOME OF THEIR FINDINGS RELEASE SOME OF THEIR FINDINGS ON RYAN ZINKE AND HIS WIFE AND ON RYAN ZINKE AND HIS WIFE AND THEIR TAXPAYER-FUNDED TRAVEL THEIR TAXPAYER-FUNDED TRAVEL ARRANGEMENTS. ARRANGEMENTS. THERE ARE STILL MULTIPLE THERE ARE STILL MULTIPLE INVESTIGATIONS UNDER WAY. INVESTIGATIONS UNDER WAY. APPARENTLY THAT INSPECTOR .