World News Headlines

Coverage of breaking stories

Which quotation correctly uses ellipsis to shorten anthony’s words? and when 100 or 1,000,000 people enter into a free government,

source :

Which quotation correctly uses ellipsis to shorten anthony’s words? and when 100 or 1,000,000 people enter into a free government,

The answer to this question: Which quotation correctly uses ellipsis to shorten Anthony´s words, is, B: “And when… people enter into a free government, they do not barter away their natural rights; they simply pledge themselves to protect each other in the enjoyment of them, through prescribed judicial and legislative tribunals.”


The purpose of ellipsis, is to allow a person to quote information from a source, but in a way, summarize the main points of the quote, especially when it is particularly long, and there is information that is not necessary from the quote. The important part is for the person who uses this technique to select the information that, if removed from the quote, would not damage the understanding of the idea the original writer wanted to convey, or would distort the correct meaning of the quote, just to make it suit the one who has borrowed the quote. In this case, in summarizing the ideas from Susan B. Anthony´s speech, and putting into a quote, the only portion of information that is not needed to understand the main idea set by Anthony, is the number of people. This is why, removing that data from the quote does not alter the main purpose, or idea, of the text used as a quote.

Which quotation correctly uses ellipsis to shorten twain's words?

Which quotation correctly uses ellipsis to shorten twain's words? – The quotation that correctly uses the ellipsis to shorten Twain's words is D. As for this city's government, I don't want to say much, except that it An ellipsis is a set of three dots (…) that is used when words are emitted. In this quote they are used correctly because some of the information that…This site is using cookies under cookie policy. You can specify conditions of storing and accessing cookies in your browser.Which quotation correctly uses ellipsis to shorten Anthony's words? I should like to see that whiplash, the ballot, in the hands of women. Which quotation correctly uses an ellipsis to shorten Twain's words without changing their meaning?

which quotation correctly uses ellipsis to shorten Anthonyy's words – Newly shortened words appear continuously; this is testified by numerous neologisms, such as demo n from demonstration; frig or fridge n from refrigerator; mike n from microphone; telly or TV n from television set; trank n from tranquillizer; trannie n from transistor; vac n from vacuum cleaner, etc.The symbol of three periods in a row ( . . . ) is called an ellipsis (plural: ellipses ). There are two reasons you might use an ellipsis. In journalism or academic writing, you can use an ellipsis to show where you've left words out of a quotation.word order. b. Use more than three words in succession from the original source. c. Distort the meaning of the original passage. b. Do not use opening and closing quotation marks to enclose quotations set off from the text, but reproduce any quotation marks that are in the passage quoted.

which quotation correctly uses ellipsis to shorten Anthonyy's words

English Language Arts 9 A-CR for Unit Test 1: The… | – When omitting words from poetry quotations, use a standard three-period ellipses; however, when omitting one or more full lines of poetry, space several periods to about the length of a complete line in the poem: These beauteous forms, Through a long absence, have not been to me As is a landscape…The author uses figurative language in this … sentence to — show how excited Chrislynn is about her life emphasize how afraid Chrislynn's classmates are of her disease illustrate how Chrislynn feels about her condition exaggerate Chrislynn's admiration of monsters.Using examples from a source text correctly in your essay is important for supporting your points. Learn how to punctuate quotations in an essay with BBC Bitesize KS3 English. In a quotation it's important to make sure you use the exact words from the original text.

Which quotation correctly uses ellipsis to shorten Lincoln ...
Hyphen (-) When To Use A Hyphen In English - 7 E S L
What Are Footnotes and How Do You Use Them? | Scribendi
Quoting from a Short Story
Which quotation correctly uses ellipses to shorten Anthony ...
Please help, i will give brainiest to person who gets it right
How do I integrate sources in APA format? | CWI
Read the excerpt from The Monsters Are Due on Maple Street ...
Ellipses | Grammar Quiz - Quizizz
The Nerdy Pleasure of Punctuation - ALPHABET SOUP
Experts have linked the increase in teen car accidents to ...

Quick Guide to APA Style 6th Edition – .

Is Butter Really Back? What the Science Says – „Наистина ли маслото се завръща?
Какво казва науката?“ Списание Тайм призова
хората: „Яжте масло“, без съмнение придобивайки популярност и продавайки
много списания, но може би с това подведе читателите си.
После последвала статия,
която засилва това с думите, че „случаят с ядене
на масло току-що се засили,“ въз основа на това проучване: Системен преглед
и мета-анализ на консумацията на масло. След преглед на всички проучвания става ясно,
че всяка дневна порция масло била свързана със само 1% по-висок риск от смърт. Чакайте малко, това е проучването,
което засилва идеята да се яде масло? Освен това, изследването предполага, че
заместването само на една супена лъжица олио с масло всеки ден ще намали
риска от диабет с 8%. По този начин, дори и при отсъствието
на големи връзки със здравето в настоящото разследване, и по-здравословни
алтернативи могат да са налични. Но увеличение от 1% в риска
от смърт е доста малко. Защо не намират по-голям ефект? Е, искам да кажа, че това е само
малка част от общата диета на хората. Илюстративно е, ако погледнем
информацията за сладките изделия. Националната асоциация на сладкарите обича да се договаря с учени
под наем – като Exponent Inc., опозорени заради работата си с тютюневата
индустрия и химическите компании – насърчавайки хората да ядат сладки
неща всеки ден в умерени количества, примерно 15 до 25 желирани бонбона на ден. Родителите, които ограничават приема на различни храни
в опит да ограничат приема на калории на децата си, просто ще ги направят дебели. Вижте, родителите използват принудителни
практики за ограничаване на достъпа на децата до вкусни, високо енергийни
или ниско калорични храни. Родителите имат смелостта да
казват на децата си кога, колко често или колко сладки да консумират. Не знаят ли, че маслото (маслените
сладки) е отново на мода? Вижте, според доказателствата захарните изделия
не са свързани със странични за здравето ефекти. Не ми ли вярвате? Ето: Десет хиляди деца биват
запитани дали са яли сладко през последните 24 часа, сравняват
се с тези, които са казали не и се стига до заключението, че
консумацията на сладко не е свързана с неблагоприятни за здравето
параметри при децата или юношите. И това изследване, при което авторите
не обявяват никакви конфликти на интереси. Това е проучване за захарните изделия,
финансирано от индустрията за захарни изделия, но няма конфликт на интереси тук. Виждате ли как с такъв тъп инструмент би било трудно да се предизвикат специфичните
последици за здравето от захарните изделия? Няма нужда от проучване, тъй като вече знаем какво
са захарните изделия: те са си захарни изделия. Предимно чиста захар. Ние вече ядем твърде много захар.
Нямаме нужда от повече. Не е нужно да плащаме на изследователи,
които да измислят проучване като това. Или това. Вече знаем какво
е масло: то си е масло. Предимно чисти наситени мазнини. Ние вече ядем твърде много наситени
мазнини; нямаме нужда от повече. Както и да е, става още по-налудничаво. Потребителите на захарни изделия е по-малко
вероятно да са с наднормено тегло и затлъстяване от тези, които не консумират сладко. Така че, може би тази компания за захарни
изделия е била права. Дайте насам захарните пиленца! Дали яденето на захарни изделия наистина е
начин за контролиране на телесното тегло? Кой може да назове някакво
алтернативно обяснение защо затлъстелите деца
ядат по-малко сладко? Точно така, обратна
причинно-следствена връзка. Може би не намаляването на
сладкото е довело до затлъстяване, а по-скоро затлъстяването е довело
до намаляването на сладкото. С други думи, докладваната
консумация на захарни изделия отразява последствията от
затлъстяването, а не причината, точно както хората със сърдечно-съдово
заболяване може да намалят яденето на масло, което замъглява връзката. И не забравяйте, че става въпрос за
„докладвана“ консумация на захарни изделия, което навежда на мисълта
за докладвано пристрастие. С други думи, децата с наднормено тегло могат
заради вината си да намалят докладвания прием на захарни изделия в по-голяма
степен, отколкото тези с нормално тегло. В противен случай какви биха били
последиците от такова откритие? Искаме ли да разделим децата на групи и да
накараме едната да яде повече захарни изделия, за да видим дали това ще
ги накара да отслабнат? Съмнително е дали, която и да е
етична комисия ще е доволна от този вид предложение, но няма как да
знаем докато не направим проучване. Ако даваме на хората допълнително или захарни изделия
или фъстъци – един и същ брой допълнително калории – изненада, изненада: тези, които са яли допълнително
захарни изделия, качили повече тегло. Но какво да кажем за това
интервенционално проучване, което показва, че захарните изделия могат да подобрят симптомите
при синдрома на дефицит на вниманието и хиперактивност? Ако сте компанията, която произвежда барчетата
Марс и искате да финансирате проучване, което да показва, че барчетата помагат на децата
да се концентрират, какво ще направите? На родителите им е изпратено официално
писмо, което ги инструктира да изпращат децата си гладни на училище,
без да са закусвали, а после там им дават или сладко или нищо на практика:
напитка с аспартам. И какво се оказва: даването
на нещо, в сравнение с нищо, подобрява способността им да
останат концентрирани върху задачата. Това ми напомня за известната реклама на
Frosted Mini-Wheats зърнена закуска, която след клинично проучване е доказано, че
подобрява вниманието на децата с почти 20%, като един наистина миниатюрен
надпис обяснява, че резултатът е в сравнение с деца,
които не са яли нищо. Маслото също е подлагано на проверка. Ако на група хора им се даде по една
порция с масло, ще получат увеличение на експресията на гена, свързан с възпалението в
рамките само на няколко часа след консумация, значително повече в сравнение със
същото количество мазнини в зехтина или в ореховата ядка. Можем да разделим хората на групи и да ги накараме
да ядат храни с всякакви видове различни мазнини, при което маслото се оказва, че е най-зле
по отношение на LDL холестерола. Да, но това са краткосрочни проучвания. Не е като да можем да разделим хората на групи и едните
да ядат масло с години, а другите да го избягват, освен ако не са заключени
в психиатрична болница, където чрез промяна на диетата можем да
повишаваме или намаляваме техния холестерол и да намалим коронарните
проблеми с около 40%, въпреки че те също намалили месото
и яйцата, така че не е само маслото. Да, но не можем да накараме
цялата страна да намали маслото. О, да, можем, 75% спад на консумацията
на масло във Финландия помага за създаването на 80% спад в
смъртността от сърдечни заболявания, което се дължи главно на намаляването на
нивата на холестерола в цялата страна, което до голяма степен е причинено
от промените в начина на хранене с цел по-нисък прием на наситени мазнини,
като отдалечаването от маслото. Изводът е, че изследователите
трябва да направят проучвания: рандомизирани контролирани проучвания,
които включват над 50 000 души и колкото повече се намалява
съдържанието на наситени мазнини, толкова повече спада холестерола
и толкова по-голяма е защитата. Съветите за промяна на начина на живот за всички
хора, които имат риск от сърдечно-съдови проблеми, за да намалим риска от убиец
номер 1 на всички мъже и жени, тези групи от населението
трябва да бъдат съветвани трайно да намалят приема си
на наситени мазнини. На Американската асоциация за сърдечни заболявания
толкова й е омръзнало от опитите на индустрията да обърка хората, че издава президентски
консултативен документ през 2017 г., за да стане колкото е възможно по-ясно: основните източници на наситени мазнини, които
трябва да бъдат намалени, включват маслото. .

On imagine la suite de la série ROME (HBO) – Recently, I had the opportunity to review in its entirety, the excellent ROME series, produced by HBO and the BBC between 2005 and 2007.
This series depicts the last decades of the Roman republic, since the victory of Julius Caesar at Alésia in -52, until the triumphs of Octavian in -29, making him the future Augustus, the first Roman Emperor. If his political intrigues, its epic fights and sexy scenes, paved the way at HBO for series such as Game of Thrones, the strength of the series is above all to intelligently mix History and fiction. The main characters are indeed two legionaries, Lucius Vorenus and Titus Pullo, whose fictitious exploits constantly cross the great characters of this Roman history. Unfortunately, the series which was to span 5 seasons, was canceled at the end of the second, obliging its creator to condense some plots of seasons 3 & 4 in the second half of the final season. Today, I am therefore offering you a rather singular episode of ANALEPSE: by analyzing his story, by cutting out its intrigues and reviewing its timeline, Let's rebuild together the missing seasons of this iconic series. In short, today we imagine the rest of Rome. Obviously, this show will disclose the different plots of the series, so if you want to keep the surprise, subscribe to ANALEPSE, go see the series and come back to see the show, after both seasons have been devoured. The warning being given, let's start now with an inventory of the existing seasons. As I mentioned in the introduction, the first begins in -52 with the Roman victory of Alésia and ends 8 years later, in the Ides of March, March 15 -44,
with the assassination of Julius Caesar. Season 2 meanwhile, is spread over a longer period of 15 years, since she resumes her plot on the very day of the dictator's death, and ended with the triumph of Augustus on August 13, 14 and 15, -29. With these elements alone, it would be difficult to imagine the rest of Rome but luckily for us, Bruno Heller, the creator of the series, gave us some avenues for reflection in an interview with the Hollywood Report in 2008. “I discovered halfway through the writing of the second season that the show was going to shut down. The second season was originally supposed to end with the death of Brutus. The third and fourth are said to have taken place in Egypt. And the fifth was to be concerned with the emergence of the messiah in Palestine. " Let us start from these few sentences to completely rethink the chronology of Rome. The cancellation of the series that took place during the writing of season 2, we can consider that season 1 is in line with the author's intentions and therefore does not require any cutting. Regarding season 2, Bruno Heller reports that it should have ended with the suicide of Brutus, that is, October 23, -42, after his defeat by the troops of Octavian and Marc-Antoine during the Second Battle of Philippi. in Macedonia Starting from this postulate, we would have had a much more detailed season 2, since his episodes would have covered a period of 2 years and not 15 years. During this season, the authors could have, for example,
focus on the fact that in certain parts of the Mediterranean basin,
the civil war between Caesar and Pompey was far from over. Sextus, the son of Pompey, was notably at the head of at least six legions in Spain, and continued to vigorously defend his father's cause. Likewise, the character of Brutus and his virtuous image of liberator of a people oppressed by a tyrant could have been further questioned. Indeed, historians today are much more skeptical about his true intentions for several reasons: firstly because of his autocratic background when he was governor of the province of Cilicia, in present-day Turkey, which led him to use the army for personal gain; but also by the discovery of coins issued the year following the assassination of Caesar and featuring the face of Brutus on the reverse. Yet until now, Caesar had been the first and only to be represented during his lifetime on coins, which had again been judged to be an autocratic act. Was Brutus finally following in the footsteps of his famous victim? Did he dream of personal power too? So many questions that could have made this season 2 particularly interesting. Regarding seasons 3 and 4, unfortunately, Bruno Heller is particularly evasive, by simply evoking that their events took place in Egypt. But if you consider that each season, for the moment,
ends with the death of an important figure, we can imagine the following timeline for season 3: This could have started in -40, a few months after the death of Brutus, with the division of the Empire between the triumvirs, and end in -29 with the suicide of Marc-Antoine and the triumph of Octave. Season 3 would then last 10 years, which is certainly much longer than the previous seasons, but still shorter than the 15 years of the original season 2. In my eyes, The advantage of this format would be to be able to bring a little more nuance to the account of the clash of the two protagonists. Indeed, season two suffered from a certain bias
sometimes relaying events such as the imperial propaganda of Augustus had dictated them. However, today, several elements are questioned by historians: The accusations about the way of life that Octavian gave to Cleopatra and Mark Antony in Egypt, was undoubtedly greatly exaggerated by the future emperor. Likewise, the compromising quotes taken from the will of Marc-Antoine, read by Octavian to the Roman senators, were carefully chosen and taken out of their context to harm him. In short, archeology and history, present us today a much less depraved Marc-Antoine as suggested by the series, and I think a season 3 taking these nuances into account could have greatly improved in quality. Season 4, logically, would then have portrayed Augustus' assertion of power, these radical reforms of the political and social life of Rome,
but also its difficulties in finding a successor. These elements would have constituted a perfect context for a new season, but in his interview, Bruno Heller asserts that this was to take place in Egypt: We must therefore move away from Rome and refocus our intrigue on this province. Since the Roman conquest, Egypt has become an imperial province with a special status: the Senate is in fact excluded from its management for the benefit of the Emperor who exercises exclusive power there through a prefect. In addition, the province is struck by several prohibitions,
in particular that of having its own senate. Various archaeological documents then evoke the development of an anti-Roman feeling among the elites of Alexandria. To maintain the pax romana, Rome obviously relies on its soldiers stationed in the province, but also on its veterans, remained permanently in the region after the war against Marc-Antoine. We could then imagine Vorenus and Pullo, our two centurions, settling in Egypt at the end of season 3, and face growing opposition from the locals in this fourth season. However, another Egyptian event could have inspired the authors of the series: The Story of Caius Cornelius Gallus. This officer of Caesar, rallied to Octavian, was the first Prefect of Egypt, chosen by the Emperor as much for his qualities as for the friendship that united them. But Gallus, worried about glory, had a text engraved in Egypt extolling his military exploits. In it, the Roman presents himself as the heir to the pharaonic royal ideology. A papyrus found by archaeologists, also evokes his desire to mint his own currency, thus breaking the bond of subordination to Rome. Worried about a potential secession from Egypt and feeling betrayed by his friend, Octave withdrew Gallus from his post of prefect.
He was also excluded from the equestrian order, sentenced to exile, the confiscation of all of his property,
which pushed the Roman to commit suicide in -26. As well, I imagine a season 4 built in the following way:
a first sequence of a handful of episodes, around the story of Prefect Gallus, would allow the story to settle in Egypt (-29 / -26). The rest of the season would then focus on the Romans' difficulties in leading the Province, but also on the growing opposition between the inhabitants of Alexandria and the Jewish populations. Once is not customary, I do not know when to end this fourth season. The early days of Egyptian history under Roman rule, do not have a large number of events known to historians.
But to maintain overall consistency, I think this season could last approximately ten years, and conclude around -20. According to Bruno Heller, the fifth and final season should have depicted the emergence of Jesus of Nazareth in Galilee. Historians still know little about the historical life of Jesus: we know that around 30 years old, he becomes the disciple of John the Baptist, a popular preacher in Judea, before parting with him and surrounding himself with disciples. After a long ellipse, I would then start this last season in Nola, in the suburbs of Naples, on August 14, with the death of the first Emperor. Octave is indeed a character that spectators have followed since the first episode of the series, so I find it hard to see the authors ignoring his death. The story would then continue in Judea, with the announcement of the Emperor's death, which would plunge the spectator directly into the tumults of the region. Indeed, Judea was at that time a sub-province of Syria, administered by the Romans with brutality and authority, which triggers regular revolts. A handful of years before the death of Augustus, Judas the Galilean, for example, led a revolt against the Roman occupiers, during which he advocates violent action, but also looting. Season 5 would therefore be part of the history of the Jewish protest movement, and could stage this great politico-religious effervescence
which affects the region, until, of course, represents the last years of Jesus' life. So when would this season end? By the crucifixion of Jesus? By his trial? On a personal note, and taking inspiration from the open ending that concluded the original series, I rather think that the episode of the Sermon on the Mount,
which marks the beginning of the teachings of Jesus, would be a more relevant ending and closer to a happy ending. So we would be in the presence of a final season, taking place over a 15-year period, mixing both anti-Roman political intrigue, and religious and spiritual development. Before concluding, I would like to add a few words about the main characters, Lucius Vorenus and Titus Pullo, which I didn't say much about after all. First, as a historian, I don't have much to add to a fictional story like theirs, apart from the plot about them which I suggested for season 4. Also, don't hesitate to use the comments below the video, to offer your take on the history of Vorenus and Pullo. I would specify all the same, that there is no chance that these 2 characters will go through the entire series: imagining that they are 20 years old in the first episode, the end of the 5th season would lead them to an age close to 100 years. It is not impossible, but unlikely. Also, I think the appearance of new characters in the original season 2, such as Agrippa, Maecenas, or even Vorena is no accident:
their role was in my opinion to create a new dynamic of characters,
to replace our two centurions, who could have lived a more or less peaceful retirement in Egypt … Finally, this little experience allowed me to see
that it was not easy to imagine intrigues unfolding during the first decades of the Roman Empire. The autocratic regime, established by Augustus, after decades of tensions and civil wars provided political stability to the Empire for nearly 200 years, which does not facilitate the work of the writers … However, it would be a mistake to imagine this period,
like a calm time, without twists and turns. As Bruno Heller understood correctly, moving away from Rome allows you to rediscover rebounding, adventure, especially in the East. Even though I tried to console you today, by imagining a possible sequel to Rome we can obviously only regret the cancellation of the series. First of all, very rare are the creations that by their decor, their costumes, their accessories, have as much sought to represent Rome in its authenticity, dirty, dangerous and populous, against the current of Hollywood representations. But above all, the great success of the series is to have understood what makes the richness of this period, that is, to use the words of historian Mary Beard, "Not just a subject of history and research, but also imagination, fiction, horror and entertainment ". .